On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 12:12:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:26:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:55:02PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 0
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 07:51:17PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 04:14:59PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Not-so-old laptops used to have parport connectors for a while, and can be
> > found at a very cheap price or even for free by now with dead batteries.
> free laptop
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 04:14:59PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > > > now. do you think it is worth that i pick up the code and modify
> > > > > it for our latest kernel and submit to Greg ?
> > > >
> > > > If you have some parport hardware, and want to take it on, that would be
> > > > great.
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 12:12:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:26:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:55:02PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 0
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 12:45:23PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:55:02PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>
> If you write the patch then I will review it. :)
sure, I am on it.
>
> > lack of ppscsi.I mailed Tim Waugh, but he is not interested to work
> > with ppscsi any
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:26:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:55:02PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:49:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 07, 20
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:55:02PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:49:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 01:55:01PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > >
> > > I hadn't look
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:55:02PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:49:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 01:55:01PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > I hadn't looked at this driver much before. It sucks that
> > parport_driver ->attach() fu
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:55:02PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:49:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 01:55:01PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > I hadn't looked at this driver much before. It sucks that
> > parport_driver ->attach() fu
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:49:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 01:55:01PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>
> I hadn't looked at this driver much before. It sucks that
> parport_driver ->attach() functions can't fail...
then maybe, we can change the code of parport. curr
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 01:55:01PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> both the misc_deregister(), parport_release() and
> parport_unregister_device() is there in the module_exit function also.
> detach is called from parport_unregister_driver() and by the time
> detach executes misc_deregister(), parp
both the misc_deregister(), parport_release() and
parport_unregister_device() is there in the module_exit function also.
detach is called from parport_unregister_driver() and by the time
detach executes misc_deregister(), parport_release() and
parport_unregister_device() has already executed markin
12 matches
Mail list logo
