On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 11:13:39AM +0300, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:50:24 -0700
> Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:57:06PM +0300, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
> > > Without including ptlrpc_internal.h, GCC gives prototype warnings
> > > "pack_generic.c:642:5: wa
Hello!
On Aug 15, 2015, at 4:13 AM, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
>>> Without including ptlrpc_internal.h, GCC gives prototype warnings
>>> "pack_generic.c:642:5: warning: no previous prototype for ..."
>> It does? What version of gcc give you that, I don't see that here.
> Yes, but it's a non-defaul
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:50:24 -0700
Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:57:06PM +0300, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
> > Without including ptlrpc_internal.h, GCC gives prototype warnings
> > "pack_generic.c:642:5: warning: no previous prototype for ..."
>
> It does? What version of gcc give y
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:57:06PM +0300, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
> Without including ptlrpc_internal.h, GCC gives prototype warnings
> "pack_generic.c:642:5: warning: no previous prototype for ..."
It does? What version of gcc give you that, I don't see that here.
_
Without including ptlrpc_internal.h, GCC gives prototype warnings
"pack_generic.c:642:5: warning: no previous prototype for ..."
and sparse also complains "pack_generic.c:642:5: warning: symbol
'lustre_unpack_req_ptlrpc_body' was not declared. ..."
Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu
---
drivers/st
