Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers

2017-06-15 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 04:48:20PM +0100, James Simmons wrote: > So this is coming from trying to understand the "merge them together" > part. Some people reading this it implies all the headers would be > eventually merged into one big header and placed into include/uapi/linux. Sounds like a g

Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers

2017-06-15 Thread James Simmons
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 08:20:15PM +, Dilger, Andreas wrote: > > On Jan 21, 2017, at 02:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:33:11PM +, James Simmons wrote: > > >> > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:06:47PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > > >>

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers

2017-06-12 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 08:20:15PM +, Dilger, Andreas wrote: > On Jan 21, 2017, at 02:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:33:11PM +, James Simmons wrote: > >> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:06:47PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > >> Not for landing.

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers

2017-06-12 Thread Dan Carpenter
Greg said to go ahead... I think you misread something. We've all agreed to move the uapi directories into a separate dir and later we can discuss if it should be one enormous file or 12 huge files. regards, dan carpenter ___ devel mailing list de...

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers

2017-06-12 Thread Dilger, Andreas
On Jan 21, 2017, at 02:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:33:11PM +, James Simmons wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:06:47PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: >> Not for landing. This is the purposed UAPI headers >> with the removal of unlikely and debug

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers

2017-01-29 Thread James Simmons
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:06:47PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > > > > > > Not for landing. This is the purposed UAPI headers > > > > > > with the removal of unlikely and debugging macros. > > > > > > This is just for feedback to see if this is acceptable > > > > > > for the upstream cli

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers

2017-01-21 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:33:11PM +, James Simmons wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:06:47PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > > > > > Not for landing. This is the purposed UAPI headers > > > > > with the removal of unlikely and debugging macros. > > > > > This is just for feedback to s

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers

2017-01-20 Thread James Simmons
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:06:47PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > > > > Not for landing. This is the purposed UAPI headers > > > > with the removal of unlikely and debugging macros. > > > > This is just for feedback to see if this is acceptable > > > > for the upstream client. > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers

2017-01-16 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 09:28:30PM +, James Simmons wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:06:47PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > > > Not for landing. This is the purposed UAPI headers > > > with the removal of unlikely and debugging macros. > > > This is just for feedback to see if this is ac

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers

2017-01-16 Thread James Simmons
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:06:47PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > > Not for landing. This is the purposed UAPI headers > > with the removal of unlikely and debugging macros. > > This is just for feedback to see if this is acceptable > > for the upstream client. > > > > Signed-off-by: James Simmo

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers

2017-01-03 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:06:47PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > Not for landing. This is the purposed UAPI headers > with the removal of unlikely and debugging macros. > This is just for feedback to see if this is acceptable > for the upstream client. > > Signed-off-by: James Simmons > --- > ..

[PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers

2016-12-19 Thread James Simmons
Not for landing. This is the purposed UAPI headers with the removal of unlikely and debugging macros. This is just for feedback to see if this is acceptable for the upstream client. Signed-off-by: James Simmons --- .../lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_fid.h | 353 + .