On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Rickard Strandqvist
wrote:
> The NULL check was done to late, and there it was a risk
> of a possible null pointer dereference.
>
> This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called
> cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
> ---
>
The NULL check was done to late, and there it was a risk
of a possible null pointer dereference.
This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called
cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
---
drivers/staging/line6/toneport.c | 15 ---
1 file changed, 8 i
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:39:00PM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.
>
> Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
This one is called from line6_disconnect
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Rickard Strandqvist
wrote:
> There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.
>
> Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
> ---
> drivers/staging/line6/toneport.c | 14 +
There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.
Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist
---
drivers/staging/line6/toneport.c | 14 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git
