On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 03/12/2017 02:32 PM, simran singhal wrote:
>> The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
>> the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
>> ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, INDIO_BUFFER_* mod
On 19/03/17 13:16, Gargi Sharma wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 17/03/17 09:32, Gargi Sharma wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 03/12/2017 02:32 PM, simran singhal wrote:
> The IIO subsystem is redefining
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 17/03/17 09:32, Gargi Sharma wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/12/2017 02:32 PM, simran singhal wrote:
The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
the IIO core
On 17/03/17 09:32, Gargi Sharma wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>
>> On 03/12/2017 02:32 PM, simran singhal wrote:
>>> The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
>>> the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
>>> ie. Chang
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>
> On 03/12/2017 02:32 PM, simran singhal wrote:
> > The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
> > the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
> > ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, INDIO_BUFFER_
On 03/13/2017 01:33 PM, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 03/12/2017 02:32 PM, simran singhal wrote:
>>> The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
>>> the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
>>> ie. C
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 03/12/2017 02:32 PM, simran singhal wrote:
>> The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
>> the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
>> ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, INDIO_BUFFER_* mod
On 03/12/2017 02:32 PM, simran singhal wrote:
> The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
> the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
> ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, INDIO_BUFFER_* modes.
>
> In this driver, mlock was being used to protect hardware
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 09:28:34AM +0530, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Alison Schofield
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 07:02:50PM +0530, simran singhal wrote:
> >> The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
> >> the IIO core only for protecting
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Alison Schofield wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 07:02:50PM +0530, simran singhal wrote:
>> The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
>> the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
>> ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, I
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 07:02:50PM +0530, simran singhal wrote:
> The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
> the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
> ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, INDIO_BUFFER_* modes.
>
> In this driver, mlock was being used t
The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, INDIO_BUFFER_* modes.
In this driver, mlock was being used to protect hardware state
changes. Replace it with a lock in the devices g
12 matches
Mail list logo
