On 08/02/17 14:16, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:05:15PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 08/02/17 11:55, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 11:43:57AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 08/02/17 09:43, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:31:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:05:15PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 08/02/17 11:55, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 11:43:57AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> >> On 08/02/17 09:43, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:31:04PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>
On 08/02/17 11:55, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 11:43:57AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 08/02/17 09:43, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:31:04PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 07/02/17 14:19, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:04:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 11:43:57AM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 08/02/17 09:43, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:31:04PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> >> On 07/02/17 14:19, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:04:14PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Add
On 08/02/17 09:43, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:31:04PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 07/02/17 14:19, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:04:14PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
Add a struct timer_list to struct gb_operation and use that to implement
g
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:31:04PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 07/02/17 14:19, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:04:14PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >> Add a struct timer_list to struct gb_operation and use that to implement
> >> generic operation timeouts.
> >>
> >> This
On 07/02/17 14:19, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:04:14PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> Add a struct timer_list to struct gb_operation and use that to implement
>> generic operation timeouts.
>>
>> This simplifies the synchronous operation handling somewhat while also
>> providing
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:04:14PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Add a struct timer_list to struct gb_operation and use that to implement
> generic operation timeouts.
>
> This simplifies the synchronous operation handling somewhat while also
> providing a generic timeout mechanism that drivers can
On 27/01/17 09:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 03:57:54PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 24/01/17 15:09, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>
>>> Bryan, if you could consider my review feedback and respin your last
>>> three patches on top of my timeout patch, I think we should be g
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 03:57:54PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 24/01/17 15:09, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> > Bryan, if you could consider my review feedback and respin your last
> > three patches on top of my timeout patch, I think we should be good.
>
> Sure thing
Bryan, can I get an Acked-
On 24/01/17 15:09, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Bryan, if you could consider my review feedback and respin your last
> three patches on top of my timeout patch, I think we should be good.
Sure thing
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://d
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 05:50:23PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 03:39:43PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> > Have you run this through loopback without any # of in-flight operations
> > constrained ?
>
> No, not yet as that would require also your changes to the loopback
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 03:39:43PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 23/01/17 15:13, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:32:48PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> >> On 23/01/17 12:04, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>
> >>> +static void gb_operation_timeout(unsigned long arg)
> >>> +{
> >>>
On 23/01/17 15:13, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:32:48PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 23/01/17 12:04, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>
>>> +static void gb_operation_timeout(unsigned long arg)
>>> +{
>>> + struct gb_operation *operation = (void *)arg;
>>> +
>>> + if (gb_operatio
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:32:48PM +, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 23/01/17 12:04, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> > +static void gb_operation_timeout(unsigned long arg)
> > +{
> > + struct gb_operation *operation = (void *)arg;
> > +
> > + if (gb_operation_result_set(operation, -ETIMEDOUT)) {
> >
On 23/01/17 12:04, Johan Hovold wrote:
> +static void gb_operation_timeout(unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct gb_operation *operation = (void *)arg;
> +
> + if (gb_operation_result_set(operation, -ETIMEDOUT)) {
> + /*
> + * A stuck request message will be cancelled
Add a struct timer_list to struct gb_operation and use that to implement
generic operation timeouts.
This simplifies the synchronous operation handling somewhat while also
providing a generic timeout mechanism that drivers can use for
asynchronous operations.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold
---
dri
17 matches
Mail list logo
