On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 06:13:00AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 11:35 +0900, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 07:04:27AM +, Dumbre, Nitesh Dilip (N.) wrote:
> > > This patch was generated by coccicheck and replaces kzalloc followed
> > > by memc
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 11:35 +0900, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 07:04:27AM +, Dumbre, Nitesh Dilip (N.) wrote:
> > This patch was generated by coccicheck and replaces kzalloc followed
> > by memcpy with kmemdup
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nitesh Dumbre
>
> Name does
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 07:04:27AM +, Dumbre, Nitesh Dilip (N.) wrote:
> This patch was generated by coccicheck and replaces kzalloc followed
> by memcpy with kmemdup
>
> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Dumbre
Name doesn't match the From: line, please fix your broken email client.
WHat is up with thi
Thanks!
But rather than that, this whole function (lprocfs_exp_setup) needs to go,
since it's not used by anything on the client.
The removal is sitting in my queue of "stop using procfs in lustre" patches
that I am going to submit real soon now and this patch would just create
an unnecessary con
This patch was generated by coccicheck and replaces kzalloc followed
by memcpy with kmemdup
Signed-off-by: Nitesh Dumbre
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
index 57c6ddd..c988be4 100644
--- a/drivers/sta
