On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Apr 2017, Kees Cook wrote:
>> While examining output from trial builds with -Wformat-security enabled,
>> many strings were found that should be defined as "const", or as a char
>> array instead of char pointer. This makes some stati
On Thu, 06 Apr 2017, Kees Cook wrote:
> While examining output from trial builds with -Wformat-security enabled,
> many strings were found that should be defined as "const", or as a char
> array instead of char pointer. This makes some static analysis easier,
> by producing fewer false positives.
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:47:11PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> While examining output from trial builds with -Wformat-security enabled,
> many strings were found that should be defined as "const", or as a char
> array instead of char pointer. This makes some static analysis easier,
> by producing few
While examining output from trial builds with -Wformat-security enabled,
many strings were found that should be defined as "const", or as a char
array instead of char pointer. This makes some static analysis easier,
by producing fewer false positives.
As these are all trivial changes, it seemed be
