On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 3:40 AM Christian Brauner
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 02:05:16PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 03:01:59PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
[...]
> >
> > One more thought, this can be made dependent on CONFIG_BINDERFS since
> > regular
> >
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 05:10:45PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:55:58AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:29:11PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:21:29AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:55:58AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:29:11PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:21:29AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:40:12PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:29:11PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:21:29AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:40:12PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 02:05:16PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:21:29AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:40:12PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 02:05:16PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 03:01:59PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > > When a binder tra
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:40:12PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 02:05:16PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 03:01:59PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > When a binder transaction is initiated on a binder device coming from a
> > > binderfs in
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 02:05:16PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 03:01:59PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > When a binder transaction is initiated on a binder device coming from a
> > binderfs instance, a pointer to the name of the binder device is stashed
> > in the bi
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 03:01:59PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> When a binder transaction is initiated on a binder device coming from a
> binderfs instance, a pointer to the name of the binder device is stashed
> in the binder_transaction_log_entry's context_name member. Later on it
> is used
When a binder transaction is initiated on a binder device coming from a
binderfs instance, a pointer to the name of the binder device is stashed
in the binder_transaction_log_entry's context_name member. Later on it
is used to print the name in print_binder_transaction_log_entry(). By
the time prin