On 04/30/2015 06:11 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:58:34PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
Gentle ping for feedback - some of our future work depends on this
and we would like to know whether this has a chance of being
accepted?
Arve wasn't CC'd on the first/usable version
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 04:58:34PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Gentle ping for feedback - some of our future work depends on this
> and we would like to know whether this has a chance of being
> accepted?
Arve wasn't CC'd on the first/usable version of this patch. He or Colin
need to Ack an
Gentle ping for feedback - some of our future work depends on this and
we would like to know whether this has a chance of being accepted?
On 04/14/2015 08:36 PM, Lauri Peltonen wrote:
Modify sync_fence_create to accept a 'struct fence' instead of
'struct sync_pt'. This will allow drm drivers t
Modify sync_fence_create to accept a 'struct fence' instead of
'struct sync_pt'. This will allow drm drivers to create sync_fence
objects and pass sync fd's between user space with minimal modifications,
without ever creating sync_timeline or sync_pt objects, and without
implementing the sync_time
