On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:48:35PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 26.09.2013 12:41, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> >Anton, I already told you politely in a private email that you are being
> >offtopic. This is professional email list for programmers. Most of us
> >are forbidden to discuss laws exc
Am 26.09.2013 12:41, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
Anton, I already told you politely in a private email that you are being
offtopic. This is professional email list for programmers. Most of us
are forbidden to discuss laws except with our corporate legal dept.
None of us are lawyers. We're not quali
Anton, I already told you politely in a private email that you are being
offtopic. This is professional email list for programmers. Most of us
are forbidden to discuss laws except with our corporate legal dept.
None of us are lawyers. We're not qualified to read any of your links
or interpret ho
Hi,
On 25 Sep 2013, at 23:29, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 26.09.2013 00:10, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
>> Please stick to technical discussions about the code on the kernel
>> mailing lists. Legal discussions can be left up to the lawyers, of
>> which we are not.
>
> Hmm, but I would like to
Hi,
On 25 Sep 2013, at 23:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:44:15PM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>> On 25 Sep 2013, at 21:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:28:56PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
Maybe a silly question, but is
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:29:03AM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 26.09.2013 00:10, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
>
> > Please stick to technical discussions about the code on the kernel
> > mailing lists. Legal discussions can be left up to the lawyers, of
> > which we are not.
>
> Hmm, but
Am 26.09.2013 00:10, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> Please stick to technical discussions about the code on the kernel
> mailing lists. Legal discussions can be left up to the lawyers, of
> which we are not.
Hmm, but I would like to know if someone has to fear getting owned by
Microsoft if he wou
Hi,
On 25 Sep 2013, at 21:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:28:56PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
>>
>> Maybe a silly question, but isn't exFAT protected by some MS owned
>> patents which might drive Linux users into the hand of MS lawyers as
>> already happened with FA
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:57:21PM +0200, Benjamin Valentin wrote:
> Am Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:27:04 -0700
> schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman :
>
> > > > Also, I would really like to get a signed-off-by: from the Samsung
> > > > authors for this patch, can you do that as well please?
> > >
> > > I've trie
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:44:15PM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25 Sep 2013, at 21:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:28:56PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
> >>
> >> Maybe a silly question, but isn't exFAT protected by some MS owned
> >> patents whi
Am 25.09.2013 23:44, schrieb Anton Altaparmakov:
> Hi,
>
> On 25 Sep 2013, at 21:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:28:56PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe a silly question, but isn't exFAT protected by some MS owned
>>> patents which might drive Linux use
Am Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:27:04 -0700
schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman :
> > > Also, I would really like to get a signed-off-by: from the Samsung
> > > authors for this patch, can you do that as well please?
> >
> > I've tried reaching them by their last public e-mail addresses I
> > could find, but they
Am 25.09.2013 22:21, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:28:56PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
Maybe a silly question, but isn't exFAT protected by some MS owned
patents which might drive Linux users into the hand of MS lawyers as
already happened with FAT? It would make me
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:28:56PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 25.09.2013 20:45, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 07:32:36PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:27:04AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>
> >>> Who did you contact at Samsun
Am 25.09.2013 20:45, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 07:32:36PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:27:04AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>>> Who did you contact at Samsung? I'll be visiting there in a week so I
>>> can try to track some people d
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:27:04AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Who did you contact at Samsung? I'll be visiting there in a week so I
> can try to track some people done in person. I really want their
> signed-off-by: on the patch, as it is their code to start with, and it's
> a bit rude t
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 07:32:36PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:27:04AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > Who did you contact at Samsung? I'll be visiting there in a week so I
> > can try to track some people done in person. I really want their
> > signed-off-b
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:36:32PM +0200, Benjamin Valentin wrote:
> Am Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:42:05 -0700
> schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman :
>
> > For staging drivers I need a maintainer that is going to take the time
> > to shephard it into the core kernel tree. See other TODO files for
> > how that
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Benjamin Valentin
wrote:
> Am Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:42:05 -0700
> schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman :
>
>> For staging drivers I need a maintainer that is going to take the time
>> to shephard it into the core kernel tree. See other TODO files for
>> how that person is def
Am Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:42:05 -0700
schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman :
> For staging drivers I need a maintainer that is going to take the time
> to shephard it into the core kernel tree. See other TODO files for
> how that person is defined. Are you going to be willing to do this?
I can see what I c
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:46:22PM +0200, Benjamin Valentin wrote:
> Samsung released their exFAT (and FAT12/16/32) driver under the GPLv2, it is
> based on the in-kernel FAT driver and can be obtained from [1].
> This patch adds version 1.2.4 of the exfat driver, sans the ifdefs for older
> kernel
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 12:46 +0200, Benjamin Valentin wrote:
> Samsung released their exFAT (and FAT12/16/32) driver under the GPLv2, it is
> based on the in-kernel FAT driver and can be obtained from [1].
> This patch adds version 1.2.4 of the exfat driver, sans the ifdefs for older
> kernel versio
22 matches
Mail list logo
