On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 01:09:49AM -0400, Gary Rookard wrote:
I moved the declarations UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and ULONG ulSFID;
from out of a switch/case statement. And also, removed useless duplicate
UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and a variant UINT uiSe
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 01:09:49AM -0400, Gary Rookard wrote:
> I moved the declarations UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and ULONG ulSFID;
> from out of a switch/case statement. And also, removed useless duplicate
> UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and a variant UINT uiSearchRuleIndex;.
>
> Signed-off-by
Hi Mark,
Yes, in fact it does if not for the shear fact that a declaration is
not a statement. This file as well as the rest of bcm is in working draft
state a real wart hog so to speak, and contained w/in it are
developer tricks to mask over would be compiler errors that would crop
up during th
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 01:09:49AM -0400, Gary Rookard wrote:
> I moved the declarations UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and ULONG ulSFID;
> from out of a switch/case statement. And also, removed useless duplicate
> UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and a variant UINT uiSearchRuleIndex;.
Hi,
This looks l
I moved the declarations UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and ULONG ulSFID;
from out of a switch/case statement. And also, removed useless duplicate
UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and a variant UINT uiSearchRuleIndex;.
Signed-off-by: Gary Alan Rookard
---
On branch staging-next
drivers/staging/bcm/Cm
