On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 08:21:34PM -0400, Gary Rookard wrote:
Firstly, some background is needed to confirm the validity of
this patch as error fixing. It seems the developer when writing
this driver from scratch, used what are known to me as error
suppress
Firstly, some background is needed to confirm the validity of
this patch as error fixing. It seems the developer when writing
this driver from scratch, used what are known to me as error
suppressors in the form of extra tmp bracing added to the case labels.
They aid during construction time, but ar
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 08:21:34PM -0400, Gary Rookard wrote:
> Firstly, some background is needed to confirm the validity of
> this patch as error fixing. It seems the developer when writing
> this driver from scratch, used what are known to me as error
> suppressors in the form of extra tmp braci
Firstly, some background is needed to confirm the validity of
this patch as error fixing. It seems the developer when writing
this driver from scratch, used what are known to me as error
suppressors in the form of extra tmp bracing added to the case labels.
They aid during construction time, but ar
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:01:24PM -0400, Gary Rookard wrote:
Firstly, some background is needed to confirm the validity of
this patch as error fixing. It seems the developer when writing
this driver from scratch, used what are known to me as error
suppress
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 06:01:24PM -0400, Gary Rookard wrote:
> Firstly, some background is needed to confirm the validity of
> this patch as error fixing. It seems the developer when writing
> this driver from scratch, used what are known to me as error
> suppressors in the form of extra tmp brac
Firstly, some background is needed to confirm the validity of
this patch as error fixing. It seems the developer when writing
this driver from scratch, used what are known to me as error
suppressors in the form of extra tmp bracing added to the case labels.
They aid during construction time, but a
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 01:09:49AM -0400, Gary Rookard wrote:
I moved the declarations UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and ULONG ulSFID;
from out of a switch/case statement. And also, removed useless duplicate
UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and a variant UINT uiSe
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 01:09:49AM -0400, Gary Rookard wrote:
> I moved the declarations UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and ULONG ulSFID;
> from out of a switch/case statement. And also, removed useless duplicate
> UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and a variant UINT uiSearchRuleIndex;.
>
> Signed-off-by
Firstly, some background is needed to confirm the validity of
this patch as error fixing. It seems the developer when writing
this driver from scratch, used what are known to me as error
suppressors in the form of extra tmp bracing added to the case labels.
They aid during construction time, but a
Hi Mark,
Yes, in fact it does if not for the shear fact that a declaration is
not a statement. This file as well as the rest of bcm is in working draft
state a real wart hog so to speak, and contained w/in it are
developer tricks to mask over would be compiler errors that would crop
up during th
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 01:09:49AM -0400, Gary Rookard wrote:
> I moved the declarations UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and ULONG ulSFID;
> from out of a switch/case statement. And also, removed useless duplicate
> UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and a variant UINT uiSearchRuleIndex;.
Hi,
This looks l
I moved the declarations UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and ULONG ulSFID;
from out of a switch/case statement. And also, removed useless duplicate
UINT uiSearchRuleIndex = 0; and a variant UINT uiSearchRuleIndex;.
Signed-off-by: Gary Alan Rookard
---
On branch staging-next
drivers/staging/bcm/Cm
13 matches
Mail list logo
