On Feb 03 Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 02/03/2015 03:44 AM, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > On Feb 02 Peter Hurley wrote:
[...]
> >> The problem is a host with the old OUIs will not recognize a remote
> >> unit with the new OUIs, and vice versa.
> >>
> >> Even
rotocol are your own,
and as yet unmerged. (In addition, there does not yet exist a second
implementation, AFAIK.) So I'd say there is still opportunity to improve
the protocol even in incompatible ways if justified. Switching to
valid identifiers may very well be su
quot; will remain
true only once a corresponding change to firewire-core was merged.
Proposed patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux1394-devel&m=142247554618207
(If I receive no substantial objections, this will go in in the next
merge window.)
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:04:48 +0100
From: Clemen
