Hello,
Should I send this patch again due the spelling mistake in the patch
description?
Thanks,
Shalin
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Shalin Mehta wrote:
>
>> The parentehsis are fixed in the macro for the ldlm lock to s
The parentehsis are fixed in the macro for the ldlm lock to set and
clear the flags.
Signed-off-by: Shalin Mehta
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_dlm_flags.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include
From: Shalin Mehta
This issue is showed up while compiling with sparse. The iov_base in struct
iovec struct explicitly declares that the assigned value should be user space
pointer with __user macro. Where as here, the __user macro isn't used while
casting.
Signed-off-by: Shalin
Fixed warnings in all of three files where the string was initilized with an
integer instead of NULL
Signed-off-by: Shalin Mehta
---
drivers/staging/speakup/main.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_audptr.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/speakup/varhandlers.c| 2 +-
3 files
From: Shalin Mehta
The function implementations of the PHSModule didn't match with the
declaration. The functions are static
in the declaration but in the implemntation they are non-static
Signed-off-by: Shalin Mehta
---
NOTE: Submitting the same patch again. Added NOTE at wrong locatio
From: Shalin Mehta
NOTE: Sending it again. I got mail delivery failure due to typo in emai ID
gre...@linuxfoundation.org
The function implementations of the PHSModule didn't match with the
declaration. The functions are static
in the declaration but in the implemntation they are non-s
From: Shalin Mehta
The function implementations of the PHSModule didn't match with the
declaration. The functions are static
in the declaration but in the implemntation they are non-static
Signed-off-by: Shalin Mehta
---
drivers/staging/bcm/PHSModule.c | 12 ++--
1 file chang
