On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Octavian Purdila
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Octavian Purdila
>>> wrote:
>>>> On We
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Octavian Purdila
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
>>>
>>> Assuming you are talking about a kernel compat layer that translates
>>>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
>
> Assuming you are talking about a kernel compat layer that translates
> the flat_binder_object structs as they pass between 32 bit and 64 bit
> processes, that will not always work. The data portion of the message
> sometimes contain size v
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:55:34PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:46:42PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
>>> >> On W