[PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: include missing header

ing: symbol 'phy_set_tx_power_level' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/phy.c:324:6: warning: symbol 'phy_set_bw_mode' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/phy.c:360:6: warning: symbol 'phy_sw_chnl'

[PATCH] staging: ft1000: remove procfs entries

This patch started as a fix to some checkpatch complaints in ft1000 procfs code but Greg suggested to remove the procfs entries altogether: http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/driverdev-devel/2014-July/055594.html Signed-off-by: Nicolas Thery --- drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000

Re: [PATCH] staging: ft1000: fix some checkpatch complaints

On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:35:38AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:23:53AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Sun, 2014-07-27 at 19:08 +0200, Nicolas Thery wrote: > > > This patch fixes the following errors and warnings: > > [] > > > diff --gi

[PATCH] staging: ft1000: fix some checkpatch complaints

multiple statements should be enclosed in a do - while loop ft1000_proc.c:49: WARNING: static const char * array should probably be static const char * const ft1000_proc.c:53: WARNING: static const char * array should probably be static const char * const Signed-off-by: Nicolas Thery --- drivers

Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: vt6656: fix leaks in error path

Sorry I didn't know staging patches should be based against linux-next. Please disregard this patch and the previous one. Best regards Nicolas On 30 May 2014 21:23, Christian Engelmayer wrote: > On Fri, 30 May 2014 20:47:44 +0200, Nicolas Thery wrote: >> Fix memory leaks

[PATCH 2/2] staging: vt6656: fix leaks in error path

Fix memory leaks in ioctl error handling paths. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Thery --- drivers/staging/vt6656/hostap.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/hostap.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/hostap.c index 506e5d3..a25bfef 100644 --- a