Re: [PATCH RFC v2 00/35] Second preview of imx-drm cleanup series

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:18:21 + Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Now, mind explaining what "v4l2 style device tree bindings" means? I've > no idea since I'm relatively new to DT. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt For the Cubox, I have: tda998x: hdmi-enco

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drivers/base: permit base components to omit the bind/unbind ops

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:12:33 + Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > I've NAK'd these patches already - I believe they're based on a > mis-understanding of how this should be used. I believe Jean-Francois > has only looked at the core, rather than looking at the imx-drm example > it was posted w

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] drivers/base: simplify simple DT-based components

On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:23:51 + Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Here's my changes to the TDA998x driver to add support for the component > helper. The TDA998x driver retains support for the old way so that > drivers can be transitioned. For any one DRM "card" the transition to I rewrote th

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] drivers/base: simplify simple DT-based components

On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:33:26 + Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 06:11:08PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > > This patch series tries to simplify the code of simple devices in case > > they are part of componentised subsystems, are declared in a DT,

[PATCH v3 0/2] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

*** BLURB HERE *** Jean-Francois Moine (2): drivers/base: permit base components to omit the bind/unbind ops drivers/base: declare phandle DT nodes as components drivers/base/component.c | 21 +++-- drivers/base/core.c | 18 ++ include/linux/of.h

[PATCH v3 2/2] drivers/base: declare phandle DT nodes as components

time, the devices which are pointed to by a phandle are declared as components, except when they declared themselves as such in their probe function. Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine --- drivers/base/component.c | 12 drivers/base/core.c | 18 ++ include/linux

[PATCH RFC 1/2] drivers/base: permit base components to omit the bind/unbind ops

Some simple components don't need to do any specific action on bind to / unbind from a master component. This patch permits such components to omit the bind/unbind operations. Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine --- drivers/base/component.c | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(

[PATCH RFC 0/2] drivers/base: simplify simple DT-based components

This patch series tries to simplify the code of simple devices in case they are part of componentised subsystems, are declared in a DT, and are not using the component bin/unbind functions. Jean-Francois Moine (2): drivers/base: permit base components to omit the bind/unbind ops drivers/base

[PATCH RFC 2/2] drivers/base: declare phandle DT nodes as components

time, the devices which are pointed to by a phandle are declared as components, except when they declared themselves as such in their probe function. Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine --- drivers/base/component.c | 12 drivers/base/core.c | 18 ++ include/linux

[PATCH v3 1/2] drivers/base: permit base components to omit the bind/unbind ops

Some simple components don't need to do any specific action on bind to / unbind from a master component. This patch permits such components to omit the bind/unbind operations. Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine --- drivers/base/component.c | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(

Re: [PATCH RFC 26/46] drivers/base: provide an infrastructure for componentised subsystems

On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:46:56 + Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:04:30AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > I've chatted a bit with Hans Verkuil about this topic at fosdem and > > apparently both v4l and alsa have something like this already in their > > helper librarie