Joe Perches :
> On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 21:02 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
[...]
> > How about kernel tinification ?
>
> The tiny case where a large number of ethernet drivers are included?
No.
A couple of bytes here and there vs a cosmetic kernel wide chan
Mark Einon :
[...]
> > No need for the #define here, just assigne et131x_pm_ops to .driver.pm
> > directly, its members will be NULL and thus never called. Also, you can
> > make et131x_pm_ops const.
>
> Ok, I can change this.
>
> Btw, this appears to be a fairly standard way of using .driver.pm
Richard Weinberger :
> Am 09.07.2014 00:47, schrieb Francois Romieu:
[...]
> > What are you taking about ? netconsole does not need to receive.
>
> Isn't netconsole is only one user of netpoll ?
Out of tree users are irrelevant. See netpoll
Richard Weinberger :
[...]
> This won't work as netpoll runs with IRQs disabled.
> ->ndo_poll_controller() has to make sure that SKBs can be received and
> transmitted
> while IRQs are off. I thought calling the channel callback by hand would be
> enough to receive SKBs.
What are you taking abou
