On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 09:07:33PM -0400, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> Three questions: (a) ACK/NAK on this patch,
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong
> (b) should it be all in one patch, or one to add to errno.h and 6
> patches for 6 filesystems?), and
I don't particularly care, but
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 09:34:02AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/8/20 23:56, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> > The reason why there needs to be at least some file system specific
> > code for fuzz testing is because for efficiency's sake, you don't want
> > to fuzz every single bit in the file system,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 04:14:11AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 02:16:55AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > Hi Hch,
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 10:47:02AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 10:29:38AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > > No
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:19:39AM +0530, Pravin Shedge wrote:
> These duplicate includes have been found with scripts/checkincludes.pl but
> they have been removed manually to avoid removing false positives.
>
> Unit Testing:
>
> - build successful
> - LTP testsuite passes.
> - checkpatch.pl pas
