pic after I received your private mail.
And third, "the fuck" just describes the topic perfectly.
Regards,
Alexander Holler
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
ies into the ground because most of them are unable to
even think about having the money needed to talk with Microsoft lawyers
in front of a court.
Regards,
Alexander Holler
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.lin
Am 25.09.2013 23:44, schrieb Anton Altaparmakov:
> Hi,
>
> On 25 Sep 2013, at 21:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:28:56PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe a silly question, but isn't exFAT protected by some MS
Am 25.09.2013 22:21, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:28:56PM +0200, Alexander Holler wrote:
Maybe a silly question, but isn't exFAT protected by some MS owned
patents which might drive Linux users into the hand of MS lawyers as
already happened with FAT? It would
this for years, nothing new here at all.
Maybe a silly question, but isn't exFAT protected by some MS owned
patents which might drive Linux users into the hand of MS lawyers as
already happened with FAT? It would make me wonder if not. Maybe you
could ask Samsung about that too, when you
