On Sat, 2 May 2015, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
>
> On May 2, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> > Summarize OBD_CPT_ALLOC_GFP, OBD_CPT_ALLOC, and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR as a
> > function, obd_cpt_alloc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Some questions: Is the name OK? Is th
From: Oleg Drokin
Create libcfs_kvzalloc and libcfs_kvzalloc_cpt are
are designed to replace OBD_ALLOC_LARGE and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_LARGE.
Not a drop-in replacement as they also take gfp flags armument
for more flexibility.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
This is how I envision the OBD_ALLOC_LARGE r
Hello!
On May 2, 2015, at 4:14 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:13:11PM +, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
The patch was submitted.
But it depends on a symbol that's not exported.
I was not able to change that.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg83997.html
>
From: Oleg Drokin
Add generic helpers to allow displaying oof lustre-specific values
in /sys/fs/lustre
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
.../staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h | 26 ++
.../lustre/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c| 24
2
From: Oleg Drokin
Move just first few files from /proc/fs/lustre/llite/*/
to /sys/fs/lustre/llite/*/:
blocksizefilesfree fstype kbytesfree max_read_ahead_mb
client_type filestotal kbytesavail kbytestotal uuid
More to follow.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
.../staging/lustre/
From: Oleg Drokin
except devices, for now.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
.../lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c| 116 +
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c
b/drivers/stagi
From: Oleg Drokin
Greg, I wonder if you can take at least a brief look and tell me if this
is the direction you were envisioning wrt this particular cleanup.
It's not all-inclusive, but I have a long flight tomorrow so
if the direction is right, I can convert more of this stuff.
This does not t
> -Original Message-
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuzn...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 9:22 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Haiyang Zhang; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; Dexuan Cui; Dan Carpenter
> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] Drivers: hv: vmbus
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 11:16:48PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Some questions: Is the name OK? Is the NULL test needed? If not, should
> the call to kzalloc_node with the call to cfs_cpt_spread_node just be
> inlined into the call sites?
>
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h
On May 2, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Summarize OBD_CPT_ALLOC_GFP, OBD_CPT_ALLOC, and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR as a
> function, obd_cpt_alloc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
>
> ---
>
> Some questions: Is the name OK? Is the NULL test needed? If not, should
> the call to kzalloc_node
Summarize OBD_CPT_ALLOC_GFP, OBD_CPT_ALLOC, and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR as a
function, obd_cpt_alloc.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
---
Some questions: Is the name OK? Is the NULL test needed? If not, should
the call to kzalloc_node with the call to cfs_cpt_spread_node just be
inlined into the call s
Somehow git is threading them in the reverse order. The last thread as
well.
regards,
dan carpenter
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
On 05/01/2015 05:43 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
The platform_device_id is not modified by the driver and core uses it as
const.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen
Thanks.
---
drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7606_par.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 05:17:14PM +, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
> >> Now I like to see the current situation change and Greg you have know
> >> me for a while so you can expect a lot of changes are coming. In fact
> >> I already have rallied people from vendors outside Intel as well as
> >> universi
Hello!
On May 2, 2015, at 4:26 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 01:18:48AM +, Simmons, James A. wrote:
>> Second and far more importantly the upstream lustre code
>> currently does not have the same level of QA with what the Intel
>> branch gets. The bar is very v
Use the preferred block comment style for the copyright and driver
description header comments.
Signed-off-by: Arno Tiemersma
---
drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/daqboard2000.c | 196 +-
1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi
Tenaga Nasional Berhad
(TNB HQ) 129 Jalan Bangsar,
59200 Kuala Lumpur,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
Ini adalah satu pemberitahuan rasmi daripada ibu pejabat daripada Tenaga
Nasional Berhad sempena Persatuan Air Malaysia (PAM) untuk memaklumkan anda
mengenai Hadiah Khas Eksklusif Tenaga Nasional Berh
On Sat, 2 May 2015, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:13:11PM +, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
> > >> The patch was submitted.
> > >> But it depends on a symbol that's not exported.
> > >> I was not able to change that.
> > >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg83997.html
> > >
On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 01:18:48AM +, Simmons, James A. wrote:
> Second and far more importantly the upstream lustre code
> currently does not have the same level of QA with what the Intel
> branch gets. The bar is very very high to get any patch merged for
> the Intel branch. Each patch
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:13:11PM +, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
> >> The patch was submitted.
> >> But it depends on a symbol that's not exported.
> >> I was not able to change that.
> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg83997.html
> >
> > But you were given a hint on how to change that :)
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
