Nobody should be using any fo the old lustre 1.8 era tools
anymore, so drop compatibility with those.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/dir.c | 58 --
.../staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_internal.h | 18 ---
2 files changed, 7
These three patches remove support for code that is no longer needed.
Mostly ability to talk to old version of lustre clients and servers.
Oleg Drokin (3):
staging/lustre/ptlrpc: get rid of lustre 1.8 compatible checksums
staging/lustre: get rid of deprecaed acl mount option code
staging/lus
This is long since unused code, so get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c | 19 ---
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_li
Old version of lustre (1.8) calculated RPC checksums differently,
but the compat code is no longer important since in-kernel
version of lustre is nto compatible with 1.8 lustre servers
(that are long deprecated too).
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_net
Hi,
Oops.. sorry for the mess then. I am still trying to get to know the
codebase. I submitted a new patch where I removed the check.
Thanks for your patience :)
Best,
Filipe
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
>No, it's not the way to test the kernel version
Ah .. right! I didn't know what OBD_OCD_VERSION() was. Now I see it's
a way to test kernel version. I am going to submit a new patch
shortly.
Thanks,
Filipe
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 08:13:42PM +0100, Filipe Gonçalves wrote:
>> This patch fixes a
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Leung [mailto:jle...@v10networks.ca]
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 1:22 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan; James Bottomley; Christoph Hellwig
> Cc: Sitsofe Wheeler; Haiyang Zhang; Christoph Hellwig; Hannes Reinecke;
> linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vg
Hello!
No, it's not the way to test the kernel version, it's the way to test
internal
lustre version.
Either way maintaining compatibility with Lustre 1.8 and 2.0 servers should
not
be important anymore, so it's fine to drop this check indeed.
Bye,
Oleg
On Oct 11, 2014, at 5:06
From: Filipe Gonçalves
Given that this code is now part of the kernel tree, the #ifdef directive
comparing LUSTRE_VERSION_CODE to the kernel version is no longer needed.
As a side effect, this will also remove the sparse error "directive in argument
list".
Signed-off-by: Filipe Gonçalves
---
> On the current release of Windows (windows 10), we are advertising SPC3
> compliance.
> We are ok with declaring compliance to SPC3 in our drivers.
If you are going to declare SPC3 compliance in the drivers, are you going to
put in
checks to ensure that SPC-3 compliance doesn't get accidentally
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 08:13:42PM +0100, Filipe Gonçalves wrote:
> This patch fixes a sparse warning on layout.c (ptlrpc) that was caused by
> having preprocessor directives in the arguments to a macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Gonçalves
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c |
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 10:42 AM
> To: Christoph Hellwig
> Cc: Sitsofe Wheeler; KY Srinivasan; Haiyang Zhang; Christoph Hellwig; Hannes
> Reinecke; linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker.
This patch fixes a sparse warning on layout.c (ptlrpc) that was caused by
having preprocessor directives in the arguments to a macro.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Gonçalves
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/driv
On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 10:39 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 08:49:01AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > Microsoft Hyper-V virtual disks currently only claim SPC-2 compliance
> > even though they implement post SPC-2 features (such as thin
> > provisioning) which means the
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 08:49:01AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> Microsoft Hyper-V virtual disks currently only claim SPC-2 compliance
> even though they implement post SPC-2 features (such as thin
> provisioning) which means the Linux kernel does not go on to test for
> those features even thoug
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 05:32:49AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:41:34PM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Jes Sorensen
> >
> > We don't do anything with these, so get rid of them
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:41:34PM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Jes Sorensen
>
> We don't do anything with these, so get rid of them
>
> Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_xmit.c| 6 --
> drivers/staging/rtl8723au/include/rtw_xm
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:39:00PM +, Long Li wrote:
> Thanks Sitsofe. Can you provide more details on the test setup?
>
> The kernel trace shows that skb->mac_header=0x (which means not
> yet set, it's in RCX: ).
See reply below.
> -Original Message-
> From: deve
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 01:31:17PM +0700, Anh Le wrote:
> Add __user macro to the function declarations that accept userspace pointers
> as
> arguments.
>
if you check your patch with --strict option of checkpatch.pl , you will see
many check of :
Alignment should match open parenthesis
thanks
s
19 matches
Mail list logo
