Good day to you,
Please, I'm not internet server and I don't know if it is quite safe to share
this information with you on this portal without anyone else knowing about it.
For this reason, I'll not disclose all for now.
My Name is Marcus Cooper ,Please i have no intentions of causing you any
From: Anil Belur
- this fix replaces jiffies interval comparision with safer function to
avoid any overflow and wrap around ?
Signed-off-by: Anil Belur
---
drivers/staging/media/msi3101/sdr-msi3101.c | 16
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/driver
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Except that "filter" has an "int channel" (signed), so it can
> successfully test "channel < 0" and return early; it'll never call
> ni_stc_dma_channel_select_bitfield(channel) with a negative number.
>
> I do agree that this code should sor
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:18:30AM +0300, Kristina Martšenko wrote:
> On 27/06/14 04:11, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:41:29PM +0300, Kristina Martšenko wrote:
> >> The driver hasn't been cleaned up and nobody is working to do so, so
> >> remove it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kristina
On 27/06/14 04:11, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:41:29PM +0300, Kristina Martšenko wrote:
>> The driver hasn't been cleaned up and nobody is working to do so, so
>> remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kristina Martšenko
>> Cc: Pavel Machek
>
> This patch didn't apply to my tree for som
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:30:52AM +0530, Chetal Patil wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I have HP Pavilion dv4-1414tx laptop. I don't know exactly what is
> (/was) the issue and why ACPI support is needed for these laptops.
> After your reply I realized that the list
> "http://www.linuxdriverproject.org/medi
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:07:48AM -0700, Christopher Li wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:45 PM, wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:24:25AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >> Let's forward this to the Sparse mailing list.
> >>
> >> We're seeing a Sparse false positive testing
>
> No, this is
Hi Greg,
I have HP Pavilion dv4-1414tx laptop. I don't know exactly what is
(/was) the issue and why ACPI support is needed for these laptops.
After your reply I realized that the list
"http://www.linuxdriverproject.org/mediawiki/index.php/Drivers_Needed";
is not updated recently :(. Where can I f
Sorry for the late reply.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:45 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:24:25AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> Let's forward this to the Sparse mailing list.
>>
>> We're seeing a Sparse false positive testing
No, this is a valid complain. See my point follows.
>> drivers
On Sat, 2014-06-28 at 19:00 +0200, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
> Commit 582e9d37a9a3 'include/linux: remove strict_strto* definitions' has
> obsoleted the strict_strtol function. Use kstrtol instead.
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c
> b/drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c
[]
> @@ -3
Commit 582e9d37a9a3 'include/linux: remove strict_strto* definitions' has
obsoleted the strict_strtol function. Use kstrtol instead.
This fixes the following compilation error:
drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c: In function ‘nbu2ss_drv_set_ep_info’:
drivers/staging/emxx_udc/emxx_udc.c:3287:
From: Guillaume Morin
Simple code style fixes:
- "if(" -> "if ("
- "switch(" -> "switch ("
- move one open brace to the line of the declaration instead of
its own line
- remove trailing whitespace
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Morin
---
Changes since v1:
- added explicit description of the f
From: Anil Belur
- this fixes few sparse warnings for missing static in functions:
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c:63:6: warning: symbol
'lnet_get_routes' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/api-ni.c:69:6: warning: symbol
'lnet_get_networks' was no
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 06:48:48AM +0200, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> From: Guillaume Morin
>
> Simple code style fixes
What exactly are those code style fixes? Please be explicit.
greg k-h
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driv
When unbinding imx-drm, the following oops was observed:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0004
pgd = e995c000
[0004] *pgd=4fea5831
Internal error: Oops: 817 [#1] SMP ARM
Modules linked in: bnep rfcomm bluetooth nfsd exportfs hid_cypress brcmfmac
brcmutil
When trying to unbind imx-drm, the following oops was observed from
the imx-ldb driver:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 001c
pgd = de954000
[001c] *pgd=2e92c831, *pte=, *ppte=
Internal error: Oops: 17 [#1] SMP ARM
Modules linked in: bnep
The following two patches fix a couple of oopses I've found while
re-testing the unbind support for imx-drm.
Can I suggest that people check that it's possible to successfully
unbind and rebind the driver when they add stuff (like the ipu plane
support)?
I have these queued for Greg to pull. Tha
Fixes the tab error found in base.h, reported by checkpatch.pl tool
Signed-off-by: Morgan Stuart
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/base.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/base.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/base.h
index c7929a7..1d6e5a7
> -Original Message-
> From: Fabian Frederick [mailto:f...@skynet.be]
> Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 6:37 AM
> To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Fabian Frederick; KY Srinivasan; Haiyang Zhang;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c: remove
Fix checkpatch warning:
WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Sarah Sharp
Cc: de...@driverdev.osuosl.org
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
---
drivers/staging/rtl8821ae/rtl8821ae/hal_btc.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(
Fix checkpatch warning:
WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan"
Cc: Haiyang Zhang
Cc: de...@linuxdriverproject.org
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick
---
drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --gi
On 06/28/2014 07:39 AM, Ben Chan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Michalis Pappas wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I've been working on a driver review for gdm72xx and I think there are some
>> more issues to be fixed except from stuff reported by checkpatch.pl. Here's
>> what I've co
Argh,
I forgot to send the patches. Sorry about that... a lot of stuff is
going on here atm.
I think it would be best if I start CCing you for all new patchsets I
send. So I don't have to resend them all which would probably confuse
people ...
Hope you're fine with this?
--
Mit freundlichen Gr
23 matches
Mail list logo
