On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 02:18:27AM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:39:39AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > As the dwc2 code seems to be the "more mature" codebase, any objection
> > > > to me deleting the octeon-usb driver?
> > >
> > > If it's possible to get it wor
> -Original Message-
> From: David Herrmann [mailto:dh.herrm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 4:40 PM
> To: Haiyang Zhang
> Cc: linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org; driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org;
> Tomi Valkeinen; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard; akpm@linux-
> foundation.or
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:39:39AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > As the dwc2 code seems to be the "more mature" codebase, any objection
> > > to me deleting the octeon-usb driver?
> >
> > If it's possible to get it working on Octeon HW, then having a single
> > driver is of course the best solu
Hi
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
>> > But I saw VESA VBE in the x log. Seems it's the default driver:
>> > "/var/log/Xorg.0.log":
>> > [12.340] (II) VESA(0): Primary V_BIOS segment is: 0xc000
>> > [12.341] (II) VESA(0): VESA BIOS detected
>> > [12.341] (II) VES
On 08/16/2013 02:07 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 08:51:57PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
From: Aaro Koskinen [mailto:aaro.koski...@iki.fi]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 1:45 PM
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 06:35:10PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
Aaro, I would ask you the same qu
Hi
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Herrmann [mailto:dh.herrm...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 3:11 PM
>> To: Haiyang Zhang
>> Cc: linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org; driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org;
>> Tomi Valk
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 08:51:57PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > From: Aaro Koskinen [mailto:aaro.koski...@iki.fi]
> > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 1:45 PM
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 06:35:10PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > > Aaro, I would ask you the same question. Is the Octeon drive
> From: Aaro Koskinen [mailto:aaro.koski...@iki.fi]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 1:45 PM
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 06:35:10PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > Aaro, I would ask you the same question. Is the Octeon driver fully
> > functional? Are there any shortcomings with it that you know a
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 06:35:10PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> Aaro, I would ask you the same question. Is the Octeon driver fully
> functional? Are there any shortcomings with it that you know about?
I sent this driver when mainlining the support for EdgeRouter Lite
(http://www.ubnt.com/e
On 08/16/13 00:16, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130815:
>
lustre needs to depend on PROC_FS or provide stub functions for when
CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled, otherwise there are build errors and
warnings:
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lmv/lproc_lmv.c: In function
'lpr
> -Original Message-
> From: David Herrmann [mailto:dh.herrm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 3:11 PM
> To: Haiyang Zhang
> Cc: linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org; driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org;
> Tomi Valkeinen; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard; akpm@linux-
> foundation.or
Hi
(hint: your mail header seems to drop Reference-to/Reply-to headers
and breaks thread-info)
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Herrmann [mailto:dh.herrm...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:46 AM
>> To: Haiyang Zh
> -Original Message-
> From: David Herrmann [mailto:dh.herrm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:46 AM
> To: Haiyang Zhang
> Cc: linux-fb...@vger.kernel.org; driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org;
> Tomi Valkeinen; Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard; akpm@linux-
> foundation.or
> From: Aaro Koskinen [mailto:aaro.koski...@iki.fi]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 10:33 AM
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 06:01:50AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > It was just pointed out to me by Sebastian that it looks like both the
> > octeon-usb and dwc2 drivers in drivers/staging/ are for the same
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 08:33:10PM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 06:01:50AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > It was just pointed out to me by Sebastian that it looks like both the
> > octeon-usb and dwc2 drivers in drivers/staging/ are for the same exact
> > hardware core.
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 06:01:50AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> It was just pointed out to me by Sebastian that it looks like both the
> octeon-usb and dwc2 drivers in drivers/staging/ are for the same exact
> hardware core.
>
> Were you two aware of this?
It was mentioned here:
http://m
Hi
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm working on an issue of HyperV synthetic frame buffer driver, which seems
> to have
> a conflict with the generic vga driver (not the vesa driver). I hope to read
> and trace into
> the source code for the generic vga dr
Hi Aaro and Paul,
It was just pointed out to me by Sebastian that it looks like both the
octeon-usb and dwc2 drivers in drivers/staging/ are for the same exact
hardware core.
Were you two aware of this?
As the dwc2 code seems to be the "more mature" codebase, any objection
to me deleting the oct
--
Dear Email User,
You have exceeded the limit of your mailbox set by your IT Service, and you
will be having problems in sending and receiving mails. To prevent this,
please
click on admin link below to reset your account. Failure to do this will
result
in limited access to your mailbox and
Web de administración de notificación de e-mail
Este mensaje es de nuestro centro de mensajes de administración para toda
nuestra cuenta de correo electrónico owners.We está eliminando el acceso a
todos nuestros clientes de correo web. Su correo electrónico
cuenta se actualizará a una interfaz d
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:44:03PM +0200, Iker Pedrosa wrote:
> So, what should I do? Do I send the patch via bugzilla? I'm a newbie
> and I don't know that to do, what do you recommend me?
Take a look at the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for how
to properly send a kernel patch that
Admin Web E-mail Notification
Esta mensagem é do nosso centro de mensagens de administração para toda a nossa
conta de e-mail owners.We estão removendo o acesso a todos os nossos clientes
de webmail. seu e-mail conta será atualizado para uma nova e melhorada
interface de usuário do webmail forn
So, what should I do? Do I send the patch via bugzilla? I'm a newbie and I
don't know that to do, what do you recommend me?
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 15:38:13 +0300
Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 12:56:44PM +0200, Iker Pedrosa wrote:
> > Checking the return of dev_alloc_skb as stated i
According to Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt it is not recommended to use
msleep for 1ms - 20ms because it may sleep longer than 20ms. So, it is
recommended to use usleep instead.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:05:10 +0200
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2013-08-05 11:58:27, Iker Pedrosa wrote:
> >
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Dan Carpenter
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:40:38AM +0200, Jens Frederich wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Dan Carpenter
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:34:55PM +0200, Jens Frederich wrote:
>> >> The 0x42 initialize squence 0x101 is wro
The backlight brightness register (DCON_REG_BRIGHT) address is 0xa.
Signed-off-by: Jens Frederich
diff --git a/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.h
b/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.h
index 524ee49..e2663b1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:40:38AM +0200, Jens Frederich wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Dan Carpenter
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:34:55PM +0200, Jens Frederich wrote:
> >> The 0x42 initialize squence 0x101 is wrong. According to
> >> the specification Bit 8 is reserved, th
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:34:55PM +0200, Jens Frederich wrote:
>> The 0x42 initialize squence 0x101 is wrong. According to
>> the specification Bit 8 is reserved, thus not in use.
>> I removed it.
>
> Really these code changes should be in
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:34:55PM +0200, Jens Frederich wrote:
> The 0x42 initialize squence 0x101 is wrong. According to
> the specification Bit 8 is reserved, thus not in use.
> I removed it.
Really these code changes should be in a separate patch and labeled
"Don't set reserved bit." instead
29 matches
Mail list logo
