[PATCH] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event.

2016-04-26 Thread robert.f...@collabora.com
From: Robert Foss As per the docs, atomic_commit should return -EBUSY "if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier update pending". This patch is based on the rockchip patch below: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/151678 Signed-off-by: Robert Foss ---

[PATCH] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event.

2016-05-02 Thread robert.f...@collabora.com
From: Robert Foss As per the docs, atomic_commit should return -EBUSY "if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier update pending". This patch is based on the rockchip patch below: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/151678 Note: This patch was resent as

[PATCH] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event.

2016-05-02 Thread robert.f...@collabora.com
From: Robert Foss As per the docs, atomic_commit should return -EBUSY "if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier update pending". Signed-off-by: Robert Foss --- drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c | 6 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_kms.c

[PATCH v2] drm/vc4: Return -EBUSY if there's already a pending flip event.

2016-05-03 Thread robert.f...@collabora.com
From: Robert Foss As per the documentation in drm_crtc.h, atomic_commit should return -EBUSY if an asycnhronous update is requested and there is an earlier update pending. Note: docs cited here are drm_crtc.h, and the whole quote is: * - -EBUSY, if an asynchronous updated is requested and

[PATCH] include/drm: Reword debug categories comment.

2016-04-14 Thread robert.f...@collabora.com
From: Robert Foss The debug category comment mentions 4 categories, but more than 4 categories are listed. Let's change the wording to something a bit more generic. Signed-off-by: Robert Foss --- include/drm/drmP.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/drm