-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 20:53 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The -modesetting ddx has a totally broken idea of how atomic works:
> - doesn't disable old connectors, assuming they get auto-disable like
> with the legacy setcrtc
> - assumes ASYNC_FLIP i
well but it wasn't marked for stable so I didn't bother and
only fixed the context. Here's the backport to 4.19, compile and runtime
tested. It does fix the issue for me (like it did on mainline).
So I guess
Tested-By: Yves-Alexis Perez
commit 8a99914f7b539542622dc571c82d6cd203bddf
On mer., 2013-09-11 at 08:45 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 11:45 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> > Before plunging forward, have you observed any difference between the
> > boot modes? We have reports [1] that the backlight behaviour is
> > different with UEFI vs. UEFI+CSM or
On mar., 2013-09-17 at 17:23 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> v1 has the subject of "Rework ACPI video driver" and is posted here:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/9/74
> Since the objective is really to fix Win8 backlight issues, I changed
> the subject in this version, sorry about that.
>
> This patchset h
. the interface created by i915) is available and then do
> things accordingly(e.g. avoid register its own on Win8 systems).
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu
Tested-by: Yves-Alexis Perez
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digit
unctionality without affecting the other one.
>
> APIs to selectively remove backlight control interface and/or event
> delivery functionality can be easily added once needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu
Tested-by: Yves-Alexis Perez
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Descrip
from previous work done by Matthew Garrett,
> Chun-Yi Lee, Seth Forshee and Rafael J. Wysocki.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu
Tested-by: Yves-Alexis Perez
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
dri-dev
On ven., 2013-09-27 at 12:20 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Some testing on a *60 (T60,X60...) would also be best, I cannot test
> this on
> my T43.
>
> Anyway, the code itself looks fine, so:
I can test on T61, would that help?
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description:
On ven., 2013-09-27 at 15:05 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On ven., 2013-09-27 at 12:20 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > Some testing on a *60 (T60,X60...) would also be best, I cannot test
> >
On dim., 2013-06-09 at 19:01 -0400, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The first two patches in this series are picked from other patchesets aimed at
> solving similar problems. The last simply unregisters ACPI backlight control
> on Windows 8 systems when using an Intel GPU. Similar code could be added to
>
On mar., 2013-06-25 at 17:08 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:46:39PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> > Before Linux support for acpi_osi("Windows 2012") (and when booting with
> > acpi_osi="!Windows 2012"), brightness keys we
On mar., 2013-06-25 at 21:54 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:43:57PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2013-06-25 at 17:08 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Right, the kernel has special-casing to hook the backlight keys up to
> &
On mar., 2013-06-25 at 22:14 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:10:11PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2013-06-25 at 21:54 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > I agree, we should standardise the behaviour. And the only way we can
>
On mar., 2013-06-25 at 22:33 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > I was referring to “standardize the behaviour by leaving up to
> > userspace”. A lot of thinkpads (for example) (all the pre-windows 8
> > ones) have a perfectly working ACPI backlight interface.
>
> And this patchset won't alter their
On mer., 2013-07-17 at 10:51 -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Before Linux support for acpi_osi("Windows 2012") (and when booting with
> > acpi_osi="!Windows 2012"), brightness keys were handled by t
On sam., 2013-10-12 at 01:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> If we are to use a Kconfig option, why don't we use one instead of rather than
> in addition to a command line option? Say, we have
> CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO_WIN8_WORKAROUND and if that is set, the code will work like
> the previous version
On sam., 2013-10-12 at 00:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, October 11, 2013 12:42:43 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > v5:
> > > 1 Introduce video.use_native_backlight module parameter and set its
> > > value to false by default as sug
On mer., 2013-07-17 at 10:51 -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez
> wrote:
> > Before Linux support for acpi_osi("Windows 2012") (and when booting with
> > acpi_osi="!Windows 2012"), brightness keys were handle
On dim., 2013-06-09 at 19:01 -0400, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> The first two patches in this series are picked from other patchesets aimed at
> solving similar problems. The last simply unregisters ACPI backlight control
> on Windows 8 systems when using an Intel GPU. Similar code could be added to
>
On mar., 2013-06-25 at 17:08 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:46:39PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> > Before Linux support for acpi_osi("Windows 2012") (and when booting with
> > acpi_osi="!Windows 2012"), brightness keys we
On mar., 2013-06-25 at 21:54 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:43:57PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2013-06-25 at 17:08 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Right, the kernel has special-casing to hook the backlight keys up to
> &
On mar., 2013-06-25 at 22:14 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:10:11PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2013-06-25 at 21:54 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > I agree, we should standardise the behaviour. And the only way we can
>
On mar., 2013-06-25 at 22:33 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > I was referring to ?standardize the behaviour by leaving up to
> > userspace?. A lot of thinkpads (for example) (all the pre-windows 8
> > ones) have a perfectly working ACPI backlight interface.
>
> And this patchset won't alter their
23 matches
Mail list logo
