On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:03 AM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> We used to have a read/write argument to the old "verify_area()" and
> "access_ok()" model, and it was a mistake. It was due to odd i386 user
> access issues. We got rid of it. I'm not convinced this is any better
> - it looks very similar a
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> So if you combine all the above:
>
> D. Y. N
> D - Is the decade since birth (1991 not 1990)
> Y - is the year in the decade so you have 3.1.x, 3.2.x, .. 3.10.x, 4.1.X and
> so on
> Nice incremental number.
> N - The Linus release of this
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> So if you combine all the above:
>
> D. Y. N
> D - Is the decade since birth (1991 not 1990)
> Y - is the year in the decade so you have 3.1.x, 3.2.x, .. 3.10.x, 4.1.X and
> so on
> ? ?Nice incremental number.
> N - The Linus release of this
My system threw out a bunch of stack traces while booting
v6.12-rc1 and hung.
First of these looks like this:
[ 33.639799] fbcon: mgag200drmfb (fb0) is primary device
[ 33.651573] ixgbe :03:00.0: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit Network Connection
[ 33.652092] ixgbe :03:00.1: enabling device (01
