Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm/swsmu: Avoid using structure_size uninitialized in smu_cmn_init_soft_gpu_metrics

2021-02-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
ot be known. > > Fixes: de4b7cd8cb87 ("drm/amd/pm/swsmu: unify the init soft gpu metrics > function") > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1304 > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor I fell over this today with Linux v5.11-10201-gc03c21ba6f4e. Tested-by: Sedat

[intel-gfx] How to determine supported HDMI versions of an Intel GPU

2021-12-19 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ Please CC me I am not subscribed to any CCed mailing-lists ] Hi Daniel, I hope you are well. While searching for a new monitor I wanted to buy a miniHDMI->HDMI adapter or cable to connect it. My Samsung laptop has a Intel HD graphics 3000 GPU and a miniHDMI connector. Unfortunately, I have n

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove redundant user_access_end() from __copy_from_user() error path

2019-07-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
__copy_from_user() already does both STAC and CLAC, so the > > > > > user_access_end() in its error path adds an extra unnecessary CLAC. > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 0b2c8f8b6b0c ("i915: fix missing user_access_end() in page > > > > > f

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove redundant user_access_end() from __copy_from_user() error path

2019-08-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:25 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 9:30 PM Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-26 20:18:32) > > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-25

Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] convert i915 to new mount API

2019-08-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
: do not leak module ref counter > Fee free to add: Reported-by: Sedat Dilek [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+icZUXh068m8UFeHDXCKDi0YfL2Z=woony7j7djlqat1cz...@mail.gmail.com/ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gemfs.c | 33 +++ > fs/filesystems.c

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove redundant user_access_end() from __copy_from_user() error path

2019-08-09 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 1:03 AM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 1:22 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > tglx just picked up 2 other patches of mine, bumping just in case he's > > > not picking up patches while on vacation. ;) > > > > I'm only half on vacation :) > > > > So I can pi

Re: Linux 6.3-rc3

2023-03-22 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 1:49 PM Kalle Valo wrote: > > Nathan Chancellor writes: > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:26:17AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:05 AM Nathan Chancellor > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > On the clang front, I am still seeing the following warning tur

linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree

2016-07-15 Thread Sedat Dilek
On 7/15/16, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Dave, > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) > failed like this: > > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c:34:0: > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c: In function > 'intel_opregion_get_panel_t

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/gem: fix mmap vma size calculations

2013-07-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
; PAGE_SHIFT so we no longer get EINVAL during mmaps due to too small >> buffers. >> >> This bug was introduced in commit: >> 0de23977cfeb5b357ec884ba15417ae118ff9e9b >> "drm/gem: convert to new unified vma manager" >> >> Fixes i915 gtt mmap

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/gem: fix mmap vma size calculations

2013-07-30 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:09:32PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >>> The VMA manager is page-size based so drm_vma_node_size() returns the size >>> in pages

Re: [PATCH v2] drm/gem: fix mmap vma size calculations

2013-08-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:46 PM, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130812: > > The ext4 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > The infiniband tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge > fix patch and another so I used the version from next-20130812. > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130812: >>> >>> The

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10:18AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> with today's next-20130813 I cannot see 1/10 of my desktop-screen's >> top, it's simply black. >> I can estimate the UR

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> After a logout from my "BROKEN" Unity-2D session - the login-screen >> for LightDM seems to be OK. >> Then entering my Unity-2D desktop is OK -

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Afte

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson >>> wrote: >>> > On Tu

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Tue, Au

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson >>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > I have bisected the issue on Linux v3.11-rc5 + drm-intel-nightly: >> > >> > 5456fe3

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> > I have bisected the iss

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:03:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson >> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 13

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:40:37PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:53:25PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Files att

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:05:41PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:40:37PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> On Tue, A

Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Tue, Au

[PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
: Sedat Dilek --- include/drm/i915_drm.h | 21 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/drm/i915_drm.h index aa983f3..61a8407 100644 --- a/include/drm/i915_drm.h +++ b/include/drm/i915_drm.h @@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ typedef

Re: [PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-19 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: > On 08/14/2013 01:19 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> AFAICS, there are more updates needed to be in sync with recent >> kernel-drm. >> >> I fell over the misspelling when digging into an issue in Linux-next. >

[Linux-v4.2-10463-g9a9952bbd76a] i915: WARNING: intel_display.c:1377 assert_planes_disabled

2015-09-23 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> [ TO INTEL DRM DRIVERS maintainers ] >> >> Hi, >> >> out of curiosity and to play with the new bindeb-pkg make-target I >> built pre-v4.3-rc1 (git

[regression] Re: [Linux-v4.2-10463-g9a9952bbd76a] i915: WARNING: intel_display.c:1377 assert_planes_disabled

2015-09-23 Thread Sedat Dilek
sed@ - [1] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/commit/?h=drm-intel-fixes&id=721a09f7393de6c28a07516dccd654c6e995944a > -Daniel > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 08:23:04AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >> > On W

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130812: > > The ext4 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > The infiniband tree gained a build failure for which I applied a merge > fix patch and another so I used the version from next-20130812. > >

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130812: >> >> The ext4 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. >> >> The infiniband tr

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Sedat Dilek > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130812: >>> >>> T

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10:18AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> with today's next-20130813 I cannot see 1/10 of my desktop-screen's >> top, it's simply black. >> I can estimate th

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> After a logout from my "BROKEN" Unity-2D session - the login-screen >> for LightDM seems to be OK. >> Then entering my Unity-2D desktop is OK -

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Afte

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chris Wilson >> chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: >&

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Tue,

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek >>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Aug

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >> > I have bisected the issue on Linux v3.11

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chris Wilson >> chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: >>>

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:03:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Sedat Dilek >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson > > chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: &g

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Chris Wilson > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek >>> wrote: >>> > I have b

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:53:25PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Files attached. > > Can you also please attach a full dmesg so I can check for anything > unusual? > -2: BAD with your test-patch -3: GOOD wit

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:40:37PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:53:25PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Files att

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:05:41PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:40:37PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> On Tue, A

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:05:41PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> On Tue, A

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Chris Wilson > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Chris Wilson >> chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: >&

linux-next: Tree for Aug 13 [ screen corruption in graphical mode ]

2013-08-13 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Sedat Dilek > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:16:10PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Tue,

[PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
: Sedat Dilek --- include/drm/i915_drm.h | 21 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/drm/i915_drm.h index aa983f3..61a8407 100644 --- a/include/drm/i915_drm.h +++ b/include/drm/i915_drm.h @@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ typedef

[PATCH] intel: Update i915_drm.h and correct misspelled caching

2013-08-19 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: > On 08/14/2013 01:19 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> AFAICS, there are more updates needed to be in sync with recent >> kernel-drm. >> >> I fell over the misspelling when digging into an issue in Linux-next. >

Missing GIT tag for mesa v9.0?

2012-09-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I can't see it in [1], forgotten? Regards, - Sedat - [1] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/refs/tags

Missing GIT tag for mesa v9.0?

2012-09-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Ian Romanick wrote: > On 09/11/2012 09:40 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I can't see it in [1], forgotten? > > > Mesa 9.0 hasn't been released yet, so of course there isn't a release tag. > Hi Ian, I

mesa-8.0.x: Cherry-pick "dri/nouveau: don't use nested functions"

2013-01-17 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi I am playing again with llvm/clang v3.2 and patches I adapted from LLVMLinux project. I wanted to test my new toolchain before doing a rough testing of the mainline Linux-kernel. I decided to build the latest mesa-8.0.5 as I am on Ubuntu/precise AMD64 here by making me and my build-deps happy

mesa-8.0.5: LLVM-3.2 patchset and request for cherry-picking

2013-01-17 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, with the following patchset (13 patches) I was able to build mesa-8.0.5 with LLVM v3.2. There is one big fat patch called "gallivm,draw,llvmpipe: Support wider native registers." [1] which makes backporting hard. Jose? Regards, - Sedat - [1] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=

Re: mesa-8.0.5: LLVM-3.2 patchset and request for cherry-picking

2013-01-17 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Brian Paul wrote: > On 01/17/2013 04:23 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> with the following patchset (13 patches) I was able to build >> mesa-8.0.5 with LLVM v3.2. >> >> There is one big fat patch called &q

clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fno-builtin-memcmp'

2013-01-17 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I am playing with llvm/clang v3.2 and mesa. It's annoying to see these hundreds of warnings... clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fno-builtin-memcmp' NOTE: '-fno-builtin-memcmp' is a gcc-specific compiler-flag. I have done here a brutal solution, maybe someone else h

Re: clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fno-builtin-memcmp'

2013-01-20 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > I am playing with llvm/clang v3.2 and mesa. > > It's annoying to see these hundreds of warnings... > > clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fno-builtin-memcmp' > > NOT

Re: clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fno-builtin-memcmp'

2013-01-20 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am playing with llvm/clang v3.2 and mesa. >> >> It's annoying to see these hundreds of warnings... >> >> clang: warning:

i965 (sandy-bridge): mesa-git DRI drivers is not linked against libdrm-git (libdrm_intel.so)

2013-01-20 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I am here on Ubuntu/precise AMD64. With the attached scripts I can't use a i965_dri.so for example from gles3 GIT tree. First, I have built libdrm-2.4.41, installed and ldconfig-ed it before building mesa. I have chosen a classic XORG prefix! [ /etc/ld.so.conf.d/xorg.conf ] # Xorg lib con

Re: i965 (sandy-bridge): mesa-git DRI drivers is not linked against libdrm-git (libdrm_intel.so)

2013-01-20 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > I am here on Ubuntu/precise AMD64. > > With the attached scripts I can't use a i965_dri.so for example from > gles3 GIT tree. > > First, I have built libdrm-2.4.41, installed and ldconfig-ed it before >

Re: [PULL] kms locking rework

2013-01-20 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I am testing your patchset (original postings at [1]). >> At a 1st look it seems to be OK. >> Any tests you want me to run? > >

Re: i965 (sandy-bridge): mesa-git DRI drivers is not linked against libdrm-git (libdrm_intel.so)

2013-01-20 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am here on Ubuntu/precise AMD64. >> >> With the attached scripts I can't use a i965_dri.so for example from >> gles3 GIT t

mesa gles3 GIT: ubuntu (unity-3d) gnome-session usable with compiz

2013-01-21 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I am testing mesa gles3 GIT (up to 8d27a9f) here on my Ubuntu/precise system. [ LINUX-KERNEL ] $ cat /proc/version Linux version 3.8.0-rc4-next20130121-2-iniza-generic (sedat.di...@gmail.com@fambox) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) ) #1 SMP Mon Jan 21 13:37:01 CET 2013 [ XS

mesa/gles3: dri_util.c:192:10: error: use of undeclared identifier '__DRI_API_GLES3'

2013-01-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi Ian, due to the changes in... e90c08e dri: Define enum __DRI_API_GLES3 ...I get this breakage with mesa-gles3-git6f3caaf: make[7]: Entering directory `/home/wearefam/src/mesa/mesa-git/src/mesa/drivers/dri/common' CC utils.lo CC dri_util.lo CC libdri_test_stubs_la-dri_test.l

Re: mesa/gles3: dri_util.c:192:10: error: use of undeclared identifier '__DRI_API_GLES3'

2013-01-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
e OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 9.1-devel (git-6f3caaf) <--- VERSION 3.0! OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30 OpenGL extensions: - Sedat - On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi Ian, > > due to the changes in... > > e90c08e dri: Define enum __DRI_API_GLES3

Re: [Mesa-dev] mesa/gles3: dri_util.c:192:10: error: use of undeclared identifier '__DRI_API_GLES3'

2013-01-24 Thread Sedat Dilek
$ find mesa-git/ -name dri_interface.h mesa-git/include/GL/internal/dri_interface.h - Sedat - > On 01/24/2013 04:33 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hmm, switching to Ubuntu's distro-kernel, removing /opt/xorg and >> building the XORG stuff from scratch... >> >> 1. libdrm-git

Adding a i915 quirk (here: pipe A force quirk for testing purposes)?

2013-01-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, >From [1]: ... static struct intel_quirk intel_quirks[] = { /* HP Mini needs pipe A force quirk (LP: #322104) */ { 0x27ae, 0x103c, 0x361a, quirk_pipea_force }, ... } Triple - which value is what? 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core

Re: Adding a i915 quirk (here: pipe A force quirk for testing purposes)?

2013-01-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > From [1]: > ... > static struct intel_quirk intel_quirks[] = { > /* HP Mini needs pipe A force quirk (LP: #322104) */ > { 0x27ae, 0x103c, 0x361a, quirk_pipea_force }, > ... > } > > Tri

Re: Adding a i915 quirk (here: pipe A force quirk for testing purposes)?

2013-01-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> From [1]: >> ... >> static struct intel_quirk intel_quirks[] = { >> /* HP Mini needs pipe A force quirk (LP: #322104)

Re: [Intel-gfx] Adding a i915 quirk (here: pipe A force quirk for testing purposes)?

2013-01-29 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> ... >> static struct intel_quirk intel_quirks[] = { >> /* HP Mini needs pipe A force quirk (LP: #322104) */ >> { 0x27ae, 0x103c, 0x361a, quirk_pipea_force

Re: BUG: circular locking dependency detected

2013-01-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
[ CCing Linux-Next and MMOTM folks ] Original posting from Daniel see [0] [ QUOTE ] On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:26:53AM +1100, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Russell King wrote: >> > >> > Which may or may no

Re: BUG: circular locking dependency detected

2013-01-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > [ CCing Linux-Next and MMOTM folks ] > > Original posting from Daniel see [0] > > [ QUOTE ] > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:26:53AM +1100, Linus Torvald

[PATCH drm-intel-nightly] drm/i915: Add a pipe A force quirk for Samsung NP530U3B-A01DE

2013-01-31 Thread Sedat Dilek
top.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-January/024161.html [3] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel/commit/?h=drm-intel-nightly&id=693101618a4beedf1b3d291860aee56c5fe44a1c Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Jani Nikula Cc: intel-gfx Cc: DRI Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_displa

[PATCH drm-next] drm: udl: usb: Fix recursive Kconfig dependency

2012-08-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
ected by DRM_USB drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:22: symbol DRM_USB is selected by DRM_UDL Fix the issue by dropping "select USB_SUPPORT" from "config DRM_USB". Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig |1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/dri

[PATCH drm-next v2] drm: udl: usb: Fix recursive Kconfig dependency

2012-08-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
estore old status, but change from select to depends on USB_SUPPORT ] Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig |3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig index 3a8c683..0cbdc45 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/d

[PATCH drm-next 1/3] drm/udl: usb: Fix recursive Kconfig dependency

2012-08-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
estore old status, but change from select to depends on USB_SUPPORT ] [ v3: Use common prefix "drm/udl" in label ] Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig |3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig

[PATCH drm-next 2/3] drm/i915: Remove reference to drm_display_info raw_edid field

2012-08-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
Reported-By: Stephen Rothwell Acked-by: Jani Nikula Acked-by: Dave Airlie Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c |1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c index 29b7259..4bc1c0f

[PATCH drm-next 3/3] drm/i915/contexts: Fixup merge with commit b6c7488df68a

2012-08-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
This is a fixup patch for the merge of drm-next into linux-next caused by commit b6c7488df68a ("drm/i915/contexts: fix list corruption"). Reported-By: Stephen Rothwell Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

Re: [PATCH drm-next 2/3] drm/i915: Remove reference to drm_display_info raw_edid field

2012-08-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:16:23AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Reported-By: Stephen Rothwell >> Acked-by: Jani Nikula >> Acked-by: Dave Airlie >> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek > > This doesn't ap

Re: [PATCH drm-next 3/3] drm/i915/contexts: Fixup merge with commit b6c7488df68a

2012-08-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:16:24AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> This is a fixup patch for the merge of drm-next into linux-next caused >> by commit b6c7488df68a ("drm/i915/contexts: fix list corruption"). >> &

[PATCH] drm/i915: Remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD

2012-08-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
x-next (next-20120824). Fix this by removing __GFP_NO_KSWAPD from drm/i915 driver. Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index

Missing GIT tag for mesa v9.0?

2012-09-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I can't see it in [1], forgotten? Regards, - Sedat - [1] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/refs/tags ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: Missing GIT tag for mesa v9.0?

2012-09-11 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Ian Romanick wrote: > On 09/11/2012 09:40 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I can't see it in [1], forgotten? > > > Mesa 9.0 hasn't been released yet, so of course there isn't a release tag. > Hi Ian, I

Re: inux-next: Tree for Sept 26 (not bootable on AMD64: thermal|acpi|drm/i915|pci related?)

2012-09-26 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 today's Linux-Next runs into the following >> call-trace (machine freezes): >> >> Sep 26 19:22:58 fambox kernel: [ 11.124739

gl.h: Version mumbo-jumbo and Copyright?

2013-02-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, noticed when polishing up my build-scripts fot libdrm | mesa | xf86-video-intel (last one requires gl.h). /* * Mesa 3-D graphics library * Version: 7.6 <--- ??? * * Copyright (C) 1999-2006 Brian Paul All Rights Reserved. <--- ??? * Copyright (C) 2009 VMware, Inc. All Rights Reserve

Re: gl.h: Version mumbo-jumbo and Copyright?

2013-02-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Brian Paul wrote: > On 02/14/2013 01:10 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> noticed when polishing up my build-scripts fot libdrm | mesa | >> xf86-video-intel (last one requires gl.h). >> >> /* >>

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout (has irq: 1)! /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.210588] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. > > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] > [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout > (has irq: 1)! > /var/log/

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. >> > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Hi >> >> 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> 2013/2/28 Chris Wi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Hi >> >> 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni w

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm-intel tree related)

2013-03-12 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig) >> failed like this: >> >> drivers/built-in.o: In function `i915_min_freq_set': >> i915_debugfs.

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm-intel tree related)

2013-03-14 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> After merging the final tree, today's linux-n

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 28 [ call-trace: workqueue | drm releated? ]

2013-06-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> [ CC wq and drm(-intel) folks ] >> > > Already know the commit which caused it, mentioned on dri-devel, > waiting for danvet to wake up and look, before I revert it later. > Thanks, I like fast responses. For followers... See "workqueue

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 28 [ call-trace: workqueue | drm releated? ]

2013-06-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> >>> [ CC wq and drm(-intel) folks ] >>> >> >> Already know the commit which caused it, mentioned on dri-devel, >> waiting for danv

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 28 [ call-trace: workqueue | drm releated? ]

2013-06-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>>> >>>> [ CC wq and drm(-intel) folks ] >>>> >>> >>> Already know

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

2013-07-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20130628: >>> >>> The regu

  1   2   3   >