On dinsdag 6 september 2016 21:40:48 CEST Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:56:20PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > Actually I just cooked up another branch [2]. It just throws in some
> > memory barriers to the opregion code, and adds a a new debug print so
> > to show the resp
On donderdag 8 september 2016 13:18:41 CEST Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:04:39PM +0200, Martin van Es wrote:
> > On dinsdag 6 september 2016 21:40:48 CEST Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:56:20PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
Hi Andrea,
I'd be happy to test, but what am I testing when applying these boot
parameters? In other words: what should I report?
And just to be sure, I THINK I own an IVB but intel is not very vocal about it
when searching for familyname. I have a
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family
On dinsdag 30 augustus 2016 11:13:40 CEST Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Martin van Es wrote:
> > Hi Andrea,
> >
> > I'd be happy to test, but what am I testing when applying these boot
> > parameters? In other words: what should I report?
>
>
