This is a pointer in the gpu's virtual address space. It must be
aligned according to ctxsw_align and be at least ctxsw_size bytes
(where those values come from the nouveau_abi16_ioctl_get_zcull_info
structure). I'll change the description to say that much.
Yes, this is GEM-backed. I'm actually no
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 2:18 PM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>
> Hi Mel,
Hi, thanks for the review.
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 05:36:14PM -0400, Mel Henning wrote:
> > Userspace needs this information to set up zcull correctly.
>
> This is a very brief motivation for the commit, please also describe w
Okay, that sounds reasonable since I don't expect this to change very quickly.
Since I don't fully understand, is the suggestion here to:
1) add the interface as a function on nvkm_gr using the nvkm_gr_func
vtable and store the actual data on r535_gr
or
2) add the interface to NVIF (which IF?) and
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 9:51 AM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 06:06:34PM -0400, M Henning wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 2:18 PM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 05:36:14PM -0400, Mel Henning wrote:
> > > &g
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 8:56 AM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 07:40:56PM -0400, M Henning wrote:
> > Okay, that sounds reasonable since I don't expect this to change very
> > quickly.
> >
> > Since I don't fully understand, i
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 9:58 AM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 07:00:57PM -0400, M Henning wrote:
> > This is a pointer in the gpu's virtual address space. It must be
> > aligned according to ctxsw_align and be at least ctxsw_size bytes
> > (whe
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 1:28 PM Timur Tabi wrote:
> Instead of removing it, I think we should rename it to indicate whether
> GSP-RM is required. You
> cannot boot Ada or later without GSP-RM, so on those platforms,
> nouveau.config=NvGspRm=0 should be
> ignored, and a pr_warn should be issued
On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 11:19 PM Ben Skeggs wrote:
> Yeah, the GPUs that don't support GSP-RM can't hit the code that used
> fwif.enable anyway, so the series should be fine as it is.
We're actually talking about the reverse case. That is, on Ada what
happens if you set nouveau.config=NvGspRm=0 o
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 3:13 PM Timur Tabi wrote:
> You have a good point, but I think your change, in effect, necessitates my
> request. Previously, the
> default was no GSP-RM unless needed. Now it's yes GSP-RM, and the concept of
> "need" has been
> removed. So there's no indication any mo
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 7:48 AM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 03:01:54PM -0400, M Henning wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 9:58 AM Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 07:00:57PM -0400, M Henning wrote:
> > > &
10 matches
Mail list logo
