[REGRESSION][v4.11-rc7] drm/nouveau: initial support (display-only) for GP107

2017-05-01 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hi Ben, A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug: commit da2ba564a6dcf46df4f828624ff55531ff11d5b0 Author: Ben Skeggs Date: Thu Apr 6 10:35:26 2017 +1000 drm/nouveau: initial support (displ

[4.4-rc1][Regression] drm/i915: Check live status before reading edid

2016-02-24 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hi Sonika, A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug: commit 237ed86c693d8a8e4db476976aeb30df4deac74b Author: Sonika Jindal Date: Tue Sep 15 09:44:20 2015 +0530 drm/i915: Check live status

[4.4-rc1][Regression] drm/i915: Check live status before reading edid

2016-02-25 Thread Joseph Salisbury
rter. > Are you referring to the same issue as Oleksandr reported where a single link > dvi/hdmi cable didn’t work and dual link worked? I'm not sure if this is the exact issue or not. I'll review the other thread and compare. > > Regards, > Sonika > > -

[4.4-rc1][Regression] drm/i915: Check live status before reading edid

2016-04-18 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 03/28/2016 02:39 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > On 03/02/2016 04:58 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >> On 02/29/2016 04:33 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Joseph Salisbury >>> wrote: >>>> Hi Sonika, >>>> >>>> A k

[REGRESSION] drm/amd/dc: Add dc display driver (v2)

2018-04-30 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hi Harry, A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0].  After a kernel bisect, it was found the following commit introduced the bug: commit 4562236b3bc0a28aeb6ee93b2d8a849a4c4e1c7c Author: Harry Wentland Date:   Tue Sep 12 15:58:20 2017 -0400     drm/amd/dc: Add dc display driver (v2)

[4.4-rc1][Regression] drm/i915: Check live status before reading edid

2016-03-02 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 02/29/2016 04:33 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Joseph Salisbury > wrote: >> Hi Sonika, >> >> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel >> bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit r

[4.4-rc1][Regression] drm/i915: Check live status before reading edid

2016-03-28 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 03/02/2016 04:58 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > On 02/29/2016 04:33 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Joseph Salisbury >> wrote: >>> Hi Sonika, >>> >>> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel >>> bisec

[v3.8 Regression] Merge tag 'v3.7-rc2' into drm-intel-next-queued

2013-04-03 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hi Daniel, A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found the following was the first bad commit: commit c2fb7916927e989ea424e61ce5fe617e54878827 Merge: 29de6ce 6f0c058 Author: Daniel Vetter Date: Mon Oct 22 14:34:51 2012 +0200 Merge tag 'v3.7-rc2'

Re: [v3.8 Regression] Merge tag 'v3.7-rc2' into drm-intel-next-queued

2013-04-03 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 04/03/2013 03:16 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Joseph Salisbury <mailto:joseph.salisb...@canonical.com>> wrote: Hi Daniel, A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found the following was the first b

[v3.8 Regression] Merge tag 'v3.7-rc2' into drm-intel-next-queued

2013-04-03 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hi Daniel, A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found the following was the first bad commit: commit c2fb7916927e989ea424e61ce5fe617e54878827 Merge: 29de6ce 6f0c058 Author: Daniel Vetter Date: Mon Oct 22 14:34:51 2012 +0200 Merge tag 'v3.7-rc2'

[v3.8 Regression] Merge tag 'v3.7-rc2' into drm-intel-next-queued

2013-04-03 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 04/03/2013 03:16 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Joseph Salisbury > <mailto:joseph.salisbury at canonical.com>> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel > bisect, it was fou

[v3.10][v3.11][v3.12][Regression][PATCH 0/1] Revert "Revert "drm/i915: revert eDP bpp clamping code changes""

2013-10-16 Thread Joseph Salisbury
patch specific for 3.12 if you think this is the best way to go. Thanks, Joe http://pad.lv/1195483 Joseph Salisbury (1): Revert "Revert "drm/i915: revert eDP bpp clamping code changes"" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 18 ++ 1 file cha

[v3.10][v3.11][v3.12][Regression][PATCH 1/1] Revert "Revert "drm/i915: revert eDP bpp clamping code changes""

2013-10-16 Thread Joseph Salisbury
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195483 This reverts commit 657445fe8660100ad174600ebfa61536392b7624. Signed-off-by: Joseph Salisbury Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Paulo Zanoni Cc: David Airlie Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 18 ++ 1

[v3.10][v3.11][v3.12][Regression][PATCH 1/1] Revert "Revert "drm/i915: revert eDP bpp clamping code changes""

2013-10-25 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 10/16/2013 05:02 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:34:57PM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >> BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195483 >> >> This reverts commit 657445fe8660100ad174600ebfa61536392b7624. >> >> Signed-off-by: Joseph Salis

[Intel-gfx] [v3.10][v3.11][v3.12][Regression][PATCH 1/1] Revert "Revert "drm/i915: revert eDP bpp clamping code changes""

2013-10-31 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 10/31/2013 10:58 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Joseph Salisbury > wrote: >> On 10/16/2013 05:02 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> It's by far not that simple. Jani is working on both the underlying bug >>> and a better w/a. See >>> >

[Regression][v3.17][3.18][3.19-rc3] drm/radeon: re-enable dpm by default on BTC

2015-01-07 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hi Alexander, A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug: commit c08abf11900e19b14dd3a0cc3d105bd74519cd18 Author: Alex Deucher Date: Mon Jul 14 12:01:40 2014 -0400 drm/radeon: re-enable dpm

[Regression][v3.17][3.18][3.19-rc3] drm/radeon: re-enable dpm by default on BTC

2015-01-08 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 01/07/2015 09:51 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Joseph Salisbury [mailto:joseph.salisbury at canonical.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 5:51 PM >> To: Deucher, Alexander >> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org; LKML

[Regression][v3.17][3.18][3.19-rc3] drm/radeon: re-enable dpm by default on BTC

2015-01-08 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 01/07/2015 09:51 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Joseph Salisbury [mailto:joseph.salisbury at canonical.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 5:51 PM >> To: Deucher, Alexander >> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org; LKML

[Regression][v3.17][3.18][3.19-rc3] drm/radeon: re-enable dpm by default on BTC

2015-01-08 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 01/08/2015 12:48 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Joseph Salisbury [mailto:joseph.salisbury at canonical.com] >> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 11:26 AM >> To: Deucher, Alexander >> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org; LKML; K

[Regression][v3.17][3.18][3.19-rc3] drm/radeon: re-enable dpm by default on BTC

2015-01-08 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 01/08/2015 05:00 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Joseph Salisbury [mailto:joseph.salisbury at canonical.com] >> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 4:58 PM >> To: Deucher, Alexander >> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org; LKML; K

[Regression][v3.17][3.18][3.19-rc3] drm/radeon: re-enable dpm by default on BTC

2015-01-08 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 01/08/2015 12:48 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Joseph Salisbury [mailto:joseph.salisbury at canonical.com] >> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 11:26 AM >> To: Deucher, Alexander >> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org; LKML; K