[PATCH/RESEND 9/9] drm/tilcdc: replace late_initcall with module_init

2014-06-25 Thread Ezequiel García
(Ccing Guido back) Hello Russell, Darren, On 25 Jun 02:00 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 05:04:36PM -0500, Darren Etheridge wrote: > > On 06/17/2014 09:17 AM, Guido Mart?nez wrote: > >> Use module_init instead of late_initcall, as is the norm for modular > >> driver

[PATCH/RESEND 8/9] drm/tilcdc: remove submodule destroy calls

2014-06-25 Thread Ezequiel García
On 24 Jun 05:06 PM, Darren Etheridge wrote: > > On 06/17/2014 09:17 AM, Guido Mart?nez wrote: > >The TI tilcdc driver is designed with a notion of submodules. Currently, > >at unload time, these submodules are iterated and destroyed. > > > >Now that the tilcdc remove order is fixed, this can be ha

[PATCH/RESEND 9/9] drm/tilcdc: replace late_initcall with module_init

2014-06-25 Thread Ezequiel García
Hi Russell, On 25 Jun 03:46 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > That doesn't make any sense. Using late_initcall for the tilcdc DRM > > driver would make the tilcdc DRM get probed before any other regular > > module_init driver, including the tda998x encoder. > > A module_init() is a dev

[PATCH/RESEND 0/9] drm: tilcdc driver fixes

2014-07-02 Thread Ezequiel García
On 02 Jul 02:08 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > On 2 July 2014 12:31, Darren Etheridge wrote: > > On 07/01/2014 06:39 PM, Guido Mart?nez wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 05:08:51PM -0500, Darren Etheridge wrote: > >>> > >>> [snip] > >>> > >>> Otherwise I think this is a good and useful patch seri