Hi,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 1:27 PM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> IMO, you should move any applicable compatibles to the edp-panel schema.
> Also, I don't think you should add 'edp-panel' to them. If they can work
> better with the generic eDP driver, then that should be an internal
> kernel change with
e itself can work when these rails
are turned on. The panel is on a separate power rail and you can't
talk to the panel at all until it's powered on and then asserts HPD to
us to say it finished its boot sequence.
> W dniu 01.04.2021 o 16:57, Doug Anderson pisze:
> > Hi,
>
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:50 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 03:28:35PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > The drm_bridge_chain_pre_enable() is not the proper opposite of
> > drm_bridge_chain_post_disable(). It continues along th
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 5:58 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 03:28:46PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > Unpreparing and re-preparing a panel can be a really heavy
> > operation. Panels datasheets often specify something on th
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 6:56 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 06:19:13PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 5:50 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 03:28:35PM -0700, Douglas
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:41 AM Rajeev Nandan wrote:
>
> The backlight level of an eDP panel can be controlled through the AUX
> channel using DPCD registers of the panel.
>
> The capability for the Source device to adjust backlight characteristics
> within the panel, using the Sink device DP
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 7:32 PM kernel test robot wrote:
>
> Hi Douglas,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on next-20210416]
> [cannot apply to wsa/i2c/for-next robh/for-next linus/master v5.12-rc7
> v5.12-rc6 v5.12-rc5 v5.12-rc7]
> [If your patch is
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:40 PM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> The primary goal of this series is to try to properly fix EDID reading
> for eDP panels using the ti-sn65dsi86 bridge.
>
> Previously we had a patch that added EDID reading but it turned out
> not to work at bootup. This caused some
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:25 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 5:09 PM Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 02:08:19PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > The sc7180-trogdor-pompom board might be attached to any num
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 9:12 AM Bjorn Andersson
wrote:
>
> On Fri 16 Apr 17:39 CDT 2021, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> > It doesn't make sense to go out to the bus and read the EDID over and
> > over again. Let's cache it and throw away the cache when we turn power
> > off from the panel. Autos
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:41 PM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> Historically simple-panel had code to make sure that if prepare() was
> called on an already-prepared panel that it was a no-op. Similarly if
> unprepare() was called on an already-unprepared panel it was also a
> no-op. Essentially
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 8:40 AM Linus Walleij
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_RASPBERRYPI_TOUCHSCREEN) +=
> panel-raspberrypi-touchscreen
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_RAYDIUM_RM67191) += panel-raydium-rm67191.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_RAYDIUM_RM68200) += panel-raydium-rm68200.o
>
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 8:39 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> This adds device tree bindings for the Samsung LMS397KF04
> RGB DPI display panel.
>
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
> ---
> .../display/panel/samsung,lms397kf04.yaml | 7
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:34 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 1:47 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > This adds device tree bindings for the Samsung LMS397KF04
> > RGB DPI display panel.
> >
> > Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij
>
> Someone on DRM
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:04 AM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:29:15AM +0530, Rajeev Nandan wrote:
> > Add bindings for DisplayPort aux backlight driver.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - New
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rajeev Nandan
> > ---
> > .../bindings/leds/backlight/dp-aux-
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 5:58 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 6:59 PM Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
>
> > In commit 3235b0f20a0a ("drm/panel: panel-simple: Use runtime pm to
> > avoid excessive unprepare / prepare") we started using pm_runtime, but
> > my patch neglected to a
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 6:28 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 3:25 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> > > I think pm_runtime_disable(); need to be added there?
> >
> > I'm a bit confused. You're saying that I need to add
> > pm_runti
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 8:10 AM wrote:
>
> On 30-04-2021 02:33, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:04 AM Rob Herring wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:29:15AM +0530, Rajeev Nandan wrote:
> >>
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:41 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Hi Douglas,
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 02:26:19PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > The goal of this patch series is to move away from hardcoding exact
> > eDP panels in device tree files. As discussed in the various patches
> > in this
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 6:39 AM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:26:20 -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > eDP panels generally contain almost everything needed to control them
> > in their EDID. This comes from their DP heritage were a computer needs
> > to be able to properly con
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 2:38 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 03:18:03PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:41 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Douglas,
> > >
> >
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:51 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
>
> If we created our own connector because the driver does not support the
> NO_CONNECTOR flag, we don't want the downstream bridge to *also* create
> a connector. And if this driver did pass the NO_CONNECTOR flag (and we
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:51 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
>
> Slightly awkward to fish out the display_info when we aren't creating
> own connector. But I don't see an obvious better way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 34 ++
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:51 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
>
> For the brave new world of bridges not creating their own connectors, we
> need to implement the max clock limitation via bridge->mode_valid()
> instead of connector->mode_valid().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
>
Laurent,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 12:26 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 04:52:50PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark
> >
> > Slightly awkward to fish out the display_info when we aren't creating
> > own connector. But I do
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 5:13 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 7:35 AM Uwe Kleine-König
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 03:09:44PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > After merging the driver-core tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > > multi_v7_defconfig) fail
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 4:22 PM Philip Chen wrote:
>
> From: Philip Chen
>
> Reorg the macros as follows:
> (1) Group the registers on the same page together.
> (2) Group the register and its bit operation together while indenting
> the macros of the bit operation with one space.
>
> Also fi
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 5:08 PM Sankeerth Billakanti
wrote:
>
> The Qualcomm SC7280 platform supports an eDP controller, add
> compatible string for it to msm/binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 3 +++
>
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 6:41 PM yangcong
wrote:
>
> Hi Sam,
> This driver support boe tv1110c9m-ll3 and inx hj110iz-01a panel.The IC chip
> is used NT36523, which is a new IC.
>
> 1: panel-boe-tv101wum-nl6.c driver cannot meet the timing requirements of the
> current two panel.
>
> 2: The
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 4:03 AM yangcong
wrote:
>
> Add driver for BOE tv110c9m-ll3 panel is a 10.95" 1200x2000 panel.
>
> Signed-off-by: yangcong
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig | 10 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile |1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/pane
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 6:12 PM Philip Chen wrote:
>
> Reorg the macros as follows:
> (1) Group the registers on the same page together.
> (2) Group the register and its bit operation together while indenting
> the macros of the bit operation with one space.
>
> Also fix a misnomer for the nu
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 4:15 PM Bjorn Andersson
wrote:
>
> +static int dp_parser_find_panel(struct dp_parser *parser)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = parser->pdev->dev.of_node;
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(np, 2, 0, &parser->drm_panel, NULL);
> +
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 6:31 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-07-26 16:13:51)
> > eDP panels might need some power sequencing and backlight management,
> > so make it possible to associate a drm_panel with a DP instance and
> > prepare and enable the panel accordingly.
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 1:13 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Douglas,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:52:00PM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > This patch is _only_ code motion to prepare for the patch
> > ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Properly get the EDID, but o
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 1:17 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:52:01PM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > In commit 58074b08c04a ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Read EDID blob over
> > DDC") we attempted to make the ti-sn65dsi86 br
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 2:46 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 09:25:37AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 1:17 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:52:01PM -0800, Douglas Anders
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:40 AM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
>
> We have seen a couple cases where low memory situations cause something
> bad to happen, followed by a flood of these messages obscuring the root
> cause. Lets ratelimit the dmesg spam so that next time it happens we
>
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 5:54 AM Kalyan Thota wrote:
>
> During crtc disable, display perf structures are reset to 0
> which includes state varibles which are immutable. On crtc
> enable, we use the same structures and they don't refelect
> the actual values
>
> 1) Fix is to avoid updating the
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 8:17 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Laurent Pinchart (2021-03-17 17:20:43)
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > Reviving a bit of an old thread, for a question.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:11:43AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > @@ -265,6 +267,23 @@ connector_to_ti_sn_b
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 8:02 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> The SN65DSI86 EN pin can be hardwired to a high level, or connected to a
> global reset signal, not controllable by the kernel. Make it optional in
> those cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 8:02 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> The enable signal may not be controllable by the kernel. Make it
> optional.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 8:02 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> The AUX adapter registered in probe() need to be unregistered in
> remove(). Do so.
>
> Fixes: b814ec6d4535 ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement AUX channel")
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn6
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 8:02 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> The valid rates are stored in an array of 8 booleans. Replace it with a
> bitmask to save space.
I'm curious: do you have evidence that this does anything useful? I
guess you're expecting it to save .text space, right? Stack usage a
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 2:46 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:08:55PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 8:02 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >
> > > The valid rates are stored in an ar
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 2:42 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:08:42PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 8:02 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >
> > > The AUX adapter registered in probe() need to b
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 8:02 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> To simplify interfacing with the panel, wrap it in a panel-bridge and
> let the DRM bridge helpers handle chaining of operations.
>
> This also prepares for support of DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR, which
> requires all components i
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 8:02 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Reorganize the functions in sections, related to connector operations,
> bridge operations, AUX adapter, GPIO controller and probe & remove.
>
> This prepares for proper support of DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR that
> will add more
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 8:02 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> To prepare for making connector creation option, move connector creation
> out of ti_sn_bridge_attach to a separate function.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 8:02 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Implement the bridge connector-related .get_edid() operation, and report
> the related bridge capabilities and type. The .get_edid() operation is
> implemented with the same backend as the EDID retrieval from the
> connector .get_mod
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 8:02 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Despite the SN65DSI86 being an eDP bridge, on some systems its output is
> routed to a DisplayPort connector. Enable DisplayPort mode when the next
> component in the display pipeline is not a panel, and disable eDP
> features in tha
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 8:02 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> When the SN65DSI86 is used in DisplayPort mode, its output is likely
> routed to a DisplayPort connector, which can benefit from hotplug
> detection. Support it in such cases, with polling mode only for now.
>
> The implementation is
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 4:03 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 03:55:05PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 2:42 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:08:42PM -0700, Doug Anderson wr
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:48 PM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 9:20 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 8:18 AM Rob Clark wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 5:38 AM Thierry Reding
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 06:53:04PM -070
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 5:38 AM Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> The point remains that unless we describe exactly which panel we're
> dealing with, we ultimately have no way of properly quirking anything if
> we ever have to.
Just to clarify here: with my initial proposal we actually could still
q
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 5:09 PM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 02:08:19PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > The sc7180-trogdor-pompom board might be attached to any number of a
> > pile of eDP panels. At the moment I'm told that the list might include:
> > - KD KD116N21-30NV-
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 5:44 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 2:46 PM Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 09:25:37AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 a
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:01 AM Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
>
> > @@ -2049,15 +2049,39 @@ struct edid *drm_get_edid(struct drm_connector
> > *connector,
> > struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> > {
> > struct edid *edid;
> > + size_t old_edid_size;
> > + const struc
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:12 AM Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
>
> W dniu 30.03.2021 o 04:53, Douglas Anderson pisze:
> > Now that we have the patch ("drm/edid: Use the cached EDID in
> > drm_get_edid() if eDP") we no longer need to maintain our own
> > cache. Drop this code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: D
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:08 AM Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
>
> W dniu 30.03.2021 o 04:53, Douglas Anderson pisze:
> > eDP panels won't provide their EDID unless they're powered on. Let's
> > chain a power-on before we read the EDID. This roughly matches what
> > was done in 'parade-ps8640.c'.
> >
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:27 AM Kalyan Thota wrote:
>
> @@ -294,6 +294,9 @@ static int dpu_kms_parse_data_bus_icc_path(struct dpu_kms
> *dpu_kms)
> struct icc_path *path1;
> struct drm_device *dev = dpu_kms->dev;
>
> + if (!dpu_supports_bw_scaling(dev))
> +
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 2:53 AM Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
>
> W dniu 30.03.2021 o 04:53, Douglas Anderson pisze:
> > The register() / attach() for MIPI happen in the bridge's
> > attach(). That means that the inverse belongs in the bridge's
> > detach().
>
>
> As I commented in previous patch, i
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:14 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> @@ -818,11 +820,19 @@ static void update_inactive(struct msm_gem_object
> *msm_obj)
> mutex_lock(&priv->mm_lock);
> WARN_ON(msm_obj->active_count != 0);
>
> + if (msm_obj->dontneed)
> + mark_unpurgable(m
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:14 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> @@ -111,23 +111,15 @@ static const struct file_operations msm_gpu_fops = {
> static int msm_gem_show(struct drm_device *dev, struct seq_file *m)
> {
> struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
> - struct msm_gpu *gpu
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:14 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
>
> The last patch lost the breakdown of active vs inactive GEM objects in
> $debugfs/gem. But we can add some better stats to summarize not just
> active vs inactive, but also purgable/purged to make up for that.
>
> Sign
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:23 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:44 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:14 PM Rob Clark wrote:
> > >
> > > @@ -818,11 +820,19 @@ static void updat
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:14 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
>
> I've been spending some time looking into how things behave under high
> memory pressure. The first patch is a random cleanup I noticed along
> the way. The second improves the situation significantly when we are
> ge
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:14 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
>
> Unused since c951a9b284b907604759628d273901064c60d09f
Not terribly important, but checkpatch always yells at me when I don't
reference commits by saying:
commit c951a9b284b9 ("drm/msm: Remove msm_gem_free_work")
> S
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 4:12 AM Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>
>
> W dniu 31.03.2021 o 16:48, Doug Anderson pisze:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:08 AM Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> >>
> >> W dniu 30.03.2021 o 04:53, Douglas Anderson pisze:
>
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 6:23 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
>
> Unused since commit c951a9b284b9 ("drm/msm: Remove msm_gem_free_work")
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> Tested-by: Douglas Anderson
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
Review
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 6:24 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> @@ -45,6 +30,9 @@ msm_gem_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct
> shrink_control *sc)
> list_for_each_entry(msm_obj, &priv->inactive_dontneed, mm_list) {
> if (freed >= sc->nr_to_scan)
>
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 6:24 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
>
> In normal cases the gem obj lock is acquired first before mm_lock. The
> exception is iterating the various object lists. In the shrinker path,
> deadlock is avoided by using msm_gem_trylock() and skipping over object
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 2:08 PM Rob Clark wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
>
> lock_stat + mmm_donut[1] say that this reduces contention on mm_lock
> significantly (~350x lower waittime-max, and ~100x lower waittime-avg)
>
> [1]
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/platform/microbenchmar
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 2:44 PM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> Another simple eDP panel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - ("dt-bindings: dt-bindings: display: simple: Add N116BCA-EA1") new for v2.
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-simple.yaml
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:28 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > +/*
> > + * Some panels simply don't always come up and need to be power cycled to
> > + * work properly. We'll allow for a handful of retries.
> > + */
> > +#define MAX_PANEL_PREPARE_TRIES5
>
> Is this define used an
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 10:10 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> Add DT binding document for TI SN65DSI83 DSI to LVDS bridge.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> Cc: Douglas Anderson
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart
> Cc: Linus Walleij
> Cc: Sam Ravnborg
> Cc: Stephen Boyd
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
>
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 10:10 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> Add driver for TI SN65DSI83 Single-Channel DSI to Single-Link LVDS bridge.
> The driver operates the chip over I2C bus. Currently the LVDS clock are
> always derived from DSI clock lane, which is the usual mode of operation,
> support fo
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:09 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> On 2/4/21 6:15 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> >> +properties:
> >> + compatible:
> >> +const: ti,sn65dsi83
> >> +
> >> + reg:
> &
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:41 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> >> +static const struct regmap_range sn65dsi83_volatile_ranges[] = {
> >> + regmap_reg_range(REG_RC_LVDS_PLL, REG_RC_LVDS_PLL),
> >
> > Why is REG_RC_LVDS_PLL volatile?
>
> See register 0xa bit 7, PLL_EN_STAT .
Wow, I looked at it
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:28 AM Srinivas Kandagatla
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 27/02/2021 00:26, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > When running the latest kernel on an sc7180 with KASAN I got this
> > splat:
> >BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in a6xx_gpu_init+0x618/0x644
> >Read of size 4 at addr
Hi folks,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 2:44 PM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> This series is to get the N116BCA-EA1 panel working. Most of the
> patches are simple, but on hardware I have in front of me the panel
> sometimes doesn't come up. I'm still working with the hardware
> manufacturer to get to th
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 3:25 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:44 PM Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
>
> > - ("drm/panel-simple: Don't wait longer for HPD...") new for v2.
> > - ("drm/panel-simple: Retry if we timeout waiting for HPD") new for v2.
>
> I couldn't find these pa
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:57 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:47 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> > I guess what I'd say in summary is:
> >
> > * If you object to the retries in simple panel, I still hope the rest
> > of the series can
Hi,
On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 4:59 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 6:59 PM Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
>
> > Let's use the newly minted aux bus to break up the driver into sub
> > drivers. We're not doing a full breakup here: all the code is still in
> > the same file and remains
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:00 AM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> We'd like to be able to expose the DDC-over-AUX channel bus to our
> panel. This gets into a chicken-and-egg problem because:
> - The panel wants to get its DDC at probe time.
> - The ti-sn65dsi86 MIPI-to-eDP bridge code, which prov
Hi,
On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 5:07 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:04 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> > Pushed this one patch. Rest of the series is pending adult
> > supervision. Overall summary:
> >
> > 1. I could probably p
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:53 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:07:27PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 8:17 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >
> > > Quoting Laurent Pinchart (202
Hi,
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:12 AM wrote:
>
> On 01-05-2021 03:08, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 8:10 AM wrote:
> >>
> >> On 30-04-2021 02:33, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >>
Hi,
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 2:59 PM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> The of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node() could end up failing to find an
> adapter in certain conditions. Specifically it's possible that
> of_dev_or_parent_node_match() could end up finding an I2C client in
> the list and cause bus_find_dev
Hi,
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 4:16 AM Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> On Fri, 07 May 2021, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-05-07 at 17:00 -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >> On Fri 07 May 16:18 CDT 2021, Lyude Paul wrote:
> >>
> >> > Adding ville from Intel to also get their take on this.
> >> >
> >> > I
Hi,
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 4:17 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:12 AM wrote:
> >
> > On 01-05-2021 03:08, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 8:10 AM wrote:
> > >&g
Hi,
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:42 AM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 3:09 PM Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
> >
> > These are described in panel-common.yaml but if I don't list them in
> > panel-simple then I get yells when running 'dt_binding_check' in a
> > future patch. List them al
Hi,
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 1:02 PM Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 01:09:00PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > We want to be able to list an eDP panel as a child of a ti-sn65dsi86
> > node to represent the fact that the panel is connected to the bridge's
> > DP AUX bus. Though t
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 5:01 PM Douglas Anderson wrote:
>
> When I run:
> scripts/kernel-doc -rst drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
>
> I see that several of the kernel-doc entries aren't showing up because
> they don't specify the full path down the hierarchy. Let's fix that
> and also
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:26 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> When applying a patch to add the BOE NV110WTM-N61 panel I forgot
> to add the changes that added flags to drm_display_mode.
Sorry, I didn't mean to make more work for you!
> Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg
> Fixes: a96ee0f6b58d ("drm: p
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:28 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:53:17AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:26 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > > When applying a patch to add
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 2:10 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Hi Douglas,
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 05:00:55PM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > When I run:
> > scripts/kernel-doc -rst drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
> >
> > I see that several of the kernel-doc entries aren't showing up bec
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 6:58 AM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> The macro mipi_dbi_command() does not report errors unless you wrap it
> in another macro to do the error reporting.
>
> Report a rate-limited error so we know what is going on.
>
> Drop the only user in DRM using mipi_dbi_command() and
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 2:38 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> Improve the bindings and make them more usable:
>
> - Pick in spi-cpha and spi-cpol from the SPI node parent,
> this will specify that we are "type 3" in the device tree
> rather than hardcoding it in the operating system.
> - Drop t
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 4:45 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> This adds device tree bindings for the Samsung Mobile Displays
> LMS380KF01 RGB DPI display panel.
>
> Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: phone-de...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Douglas Anderson
> Cc: Noralf Trønnes
> Signed-off-by: Linus
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 4:55 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> This adds a driver for panels based on the WideChips WS2401 display
> controller. This display controller is used in the Samsung LMS380KF01
> display found in the Samsung GT-I8160 (Codina) mobile phone and
> possibly others.
>
> As is co
1 - 100 of 1709 matches
Mail list logo
