Re: [PATCH RFC v5 00/21] DEPT(Dependency Tracker)

2022-03-20 Thread Byungchul Park
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 04:49:45PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:39:19PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:26:12AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > I'm gonna re-add RFC for a while at Ted's request. But hard testing is > > > needed to find fals

Re: [PATCH v4 00/24] DEPT(Dependency Tracker)

2022-03-20 Thread Byungchul Park
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 04:51:29PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:30:02AM +, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 01:32:13PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 01:53:26AM +, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 0

Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] drm/i915: Prepare for multiple GTs

2022-03-20 Thread Andi Shyti
Hi Michal, [...] > > +static int intel_gt_tile_setup(struct intel_gt *gt, phys_addr_t phys_addr) > > +{ > > + int ret; > > + > > + if (!gt_is_root(gt)) { > > + struct intel_uncore_mmio_debug *mmio_debug; > > + struct intel_uncore *uncore; > > + > > + uncore = kza

Re: [PATCH v2] drm: Fix a infinite loop condition when order becomes 0

2022-03-20 Thread Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
On 16/03/22 5:01 pm, Matthew Auld wrote: > On 16/03/2022 06:34, Arunpravin Paneer Selvam wrote: >> handle a situation in the condition order-- == min_order, >> when order = 0 and min_order = 0, leading to order = -1, >> it now won't exit the loop. To avoid this problem, >> added a order check in

[PATCH] drm: add a check to verify the size alignment

2022-03-20 Thread Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
add a simple check to reject any size not aligned to the min_page_size. Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c index 72f52f293249..b503c88786b0 100644

Re: [PATCH] drm: Fix a infinite loop condition when order becomes 0

2022-03-20 Thread Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
On 16/03/22 12:28 pm, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Arunprivin, > > > Am 16.03.22 um 07:49 schrieb Arunpravin Paneer Selvam: > >> On 15/03/22 9:14 pm, Paul Menzel wrote: > >>> Am 15.03.22 um 16:42 schrieb Arunpravin: >>> On 15/03/22 2:35 pm, Paul Menzel wrote: >>> > Am 15.03.22 um 10:01

Re: [PATCH v2] drm: Fix a infinite loop condition when order becomes 0

2022-03-20 Thread Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
On 16/03/22 6:02 pm, Christian König wrote: > Am 16.03.22 um 12:31 schrieb Matthew Auld: >> On 16/03/2022 06:34, Arunpravin Paneer Selvam wrote: >>> handle a situation in the condition order-- == min_order, >>> when order = 0 and min_order = 0, leading to order = -1, >>> it now won't exit the lo

Re: [PATCH] drm: add a check to verify the size alignment

2022-03-20 Thread Paul Menzel
Dear Arunpravin, Am 21.03.22 um 06:59 schrieb Arunpravin Paneer Selvam: add a simple check to reject any size not aligned to the min_page_size. Nit: I’d start sentences with a capital letter. Could you please add a summary of the discussion to the commit message, so the question “Why?” is a

Re: [Intel-gfx] Small bar recovery vs compressed content on DG2

2022-03-20 Thread Thomas Hellström
On 3/18/22 19:12, Daniel Vetter wrote: Maybe also good to add dri-devel to these discussions. I'm not sure where exactly we landed with dgpu error capture (maybe I should check the code but it's really w/e here), but I think we can also toss in "you need a non-recoverable context for error cap