[PATCH] gpu: drm: amd: amdgpu: Fixed a few warnings

2021-08-21 Thread Liviu Cheru
Fixed warnings regarding SPDX license, using "unsigned" instead of "unsigned int", wrong function parameter name for the documentation and a space between the function name and "(". Signed-off-by: Liviu Cheru --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 9 + 1 file changed, 5 inserti

[PATCH] drm/bridge: parade-ps8640: Reorg the macros

2021-08-21 Thread Philip Chen
From: Philip Chen Reorg the macros as follows: (1) Group the registers on the same page together. (2) Group the register and its bit operation together while indenting the macros of the bit operation with one space. Also fix a misnomer for the number of mipi data lanes. Signed-off-by: Philip Ch

[PATCH linux-next] drm/nouveau/mmu: drop unneeded assignment in the nvkm_uvmm_mthd_page()

2021-08-21 Thread CGEL
From: Luo penghao In order to keep the code style consistency of the whole file, the 'ret' assignments should be deleted. The clang_analyzer complains as follows: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/uvmm.c:317:8:warning: Although the value storedto 'ret' is used in the enclosing expression,

[PATCH] drm: remove zxdrm driver

2021-08-21 Thread Zenghui Yu
The zte zx platform had been removed in commit 89d4f98ae90d ("ARM: remove zte zx platform"), so this driver is no longer needed. Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Jun Nie Cc: Shawn Guo Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu --- .../devicetree/bindings/display/zte,vou.txt | 120 --- drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig

[PATCH linux-next] video: fbdev: mb862xx: drop unneeded assignment in the mb86290fb_imageblit8()

2021-08-21 Thread CGEL
From: Luo penghao The first assignment is not used.In order to keep the code style consistency of the whole file,the first ‘ptr’ assignment should be deleted. The clang_analyzer complains as follows: drivers/video/fbdev/mb862xx/mb862xxfb_accel.c:135:9: warning: Although the value storedto 'ptr'

[PATCH linux-next] drm/nouveau/mmu/gp100-: drop unneeded assignment in the if condition.

2021-08-21 Thread CGEL
From: Luo penghao In order to keep the code style consistency of the whole file, the 'inst' assignments should be deleted. The clang_analyzer complains as follows: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmmgp100.c:499:8: warning: Although the value storedto 'inst' is used in the enclosing expr

[PATCH linux-next] drm: drop unneeded assignment in the fx_v6_0_enable_mgcg()

2021-08-21 Thread CGEL
From: Luo penghao The first assignment is not used. In order to keep the code style consistency of the whole file, the first 'data' assignment should be deleted. The clang_analyzer complains as follows: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v6_0.c:2608:10: warning: Although the value storedto 'offset'

Re: [RFC] Make use of non-dynamic dmabuf in RDMA

2021-08-21 Thread Gal Pressman
On 20/08/2021 17:32, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 03:58:33PM +0300, Gal Pressman wrote: > >> Though it would've been nicer if we could agree on a solution that could work >> for more than 1-2 RDMA devices, using the existing tools the RDMA subsystem >> has. > > I don't think

Re: [PATCH v2 45/63] ath11k: Use memset_startat() for clearing queue descriptors

2021-08-21 Thread Kalle Valo
Kees Cook writes: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 04:19:37PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Kees Cook writes: >> >> > In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time >> > field bounds checking for memset(), avoid intentionally writing across >> > neighboring fields. >> > >> > Use

[PATCH] drm: Remove repeated verbose license text

2021-08-21 Thread Cai Huoqing
remove it because SPDX-License-Identifier is already used Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper.c | 5 - drivers/gpu/drm/drm_writeback.c | 5 - 2 files changed, 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_format_

Re: [PATCH 15/27] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc submission

2021-08-21 Thread kernel test robot
your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Matthew-Brost/Parallel-submission-aka-multi-bb-execbu

[GIT PULL] exynos-drm-next

2021-08-21 Thread Inki Dae
Hi Dave, Just two fixups - fixing one build warning and missing unlock, and one cleanup - replaceing atomic_t with refcount_t. Please kindly let me know if there is any problem. Thanks, Inki Dae The following changes since commit 397ab98e2d69cede8a28eab77a171983d14e: Merge tag '

Re: [PATCH v8 01/34] opp: Add dev_pm_opp_sync() helper

2021-08-21 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
20.08.2021 15:42, Ulf Hansson пишет: > On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 21:35, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> >> 19.08.2021 16:07, Ulf Hansson пишет: >>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 17:43, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: 18.08.2021 13:08, Ulf Hansson пишет: > On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 11:50, Viresh Kumar > w

Re: [PATCH v8 07/34] clk: tegra: Support runtime PM and power domain

2021-08-21 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
20.08.2021 16:08, Ulf Hansson пишет: ... >> I suppose if there's really no good way of doing this other than >> providing a struct device, then so be it. I think the cleaned up sysfs >> shown in the summary above looks much better than what the original >> would've looked like. >> >> Perhaps an add

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/27] drm/i915: Multi-BB execbuf

2021-08-21 Thread kernel test robot
your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Matthew-Brost/Parallel-submission-aka-multi-bb-execbu

Re: [PATCH v8 03/13] dt-bindings: mediatek: add mediatek, dsc.yaml for mt8195 SoC binding

2021-08-21 Thread Chun-Kuang Hu
Hi, Jason: jason-jh.lin 於 2021年8月19日 週四 上午10:23寫道: > > 1. Add mediatek,dsc.yaml to describe DSC module in details. > 2. Add mt8195 SoC binding to mediatek,dsc.yaml. > > Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin > --- > .../display/mediatek/mediatek,dsc.yaml| 69 +++ > 1 file changed,

Re: [PATCH v3 13/15] drm/mediatek: add ovl_adaptor support for MT8195

2021-08-21 Thread Chun-Kuang Hu
Hi, Nancy: Nancy.Lin 於 2021年8月18日 週三 下午5:19寫道: > > Add ovl_adaptor driver for MT8195. > Ovl_adaptor is an encapsulated module and designed for simplified > DRM control flow. This module is composed of 8 RDMAs, 4 MERGEs and > an ETHDR. Two RDMAs merge into one layer, so this module support 4 > lay

Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] drm: rcar-du: lvds: Convert to DRM panel bridge helper

2021-08-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Geert, On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 05:51:57PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 5:47 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:51 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > Replace the manual panel handling with usage of the DRM panel bridge > > > helper. This simpli

[PATCH] drm: rcar-du: Don't create encoder for unconnected LVDS outputs

2021-08-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
On R-Car D3 and E3, the LVDS encoders provide the pixel clock to the DU, even when LVDS outputs are not used. For this reason, the rcar-lvds driver probes successfully on those platforms even if no further bridge or panel is connected to the LVDS output, in order to provide the rcar_lvds_clk_enable

[PATCH] drm: rcar-du: Improve kernel log messages when initializing encoders

2021-08-21 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Improve the debugging and error messages printing when initializing encoders by replacing the output number by the output name, printing the bridge OF node name, and the error code of failed operations. While at it, move the related rcar_du_output enumeration from rcar_du_crtc.h to rcar_du_drv.h a

Re: [PATCH v3 15/15] drm/mediatek: add mediatek-drm of vdosys1 support for MT8195

2021-08-21 Thread Chun-Kuang Hu
Hi, Nancy: Nancy.Lin 於 2021年8月18日 週三 下午5:18寫道: > > Add driver data of mt8195 vdosys1 to mediatek-drm and modify drm for > multi-mmsys support. The two mmsys (vdosys0 and vdosys1) will bring > up two drm drivers, only one drm driver register as the drm device. > Each drm driver binds its own compo

Re: [PATCH 15/27] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc submission

2021-08-21 Thread kernel test robot
your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Matthew-Brost/Parallel-submission-aka-multi-bb-execbu