On 12/11/20 1:46 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 08:50:53AM +0100, Thomas Hellström (Intel) wrote:
My understanding of this particular case is that hardware would continue to
DMA to orphaned pages that are pinned until the driver is done with
DMA,
mmu notifier replaces pinn
Hi, Yongqiang:
Yongqiang Niu 於 2020年12月12日 週六 下午12:12寫道:
>
> add description for mt8192 display
Reviewed-by: Chun-Kuang Hu
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>
Hi, Yongqiang:
Yongqiang Niu 於 2020年12月12日 週六 下午12:22寫道:
>
> add mt8192 mmsys support
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu
> ---
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mmsys/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mmsys/mt8192-mmsys.c | 119
> ++
> include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 09:46:22AM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> i.MX8qxp SoC embeds a Mixel MIPI DPHY + LVDS PHY combo which supports
> either a MIPI DSI display or a LVDS display. The PHY mode is controlled
> by SCU firmware and the driver would call a SCU firmware function to
> configure the PHY
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 09:46:21AM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> Add support for Mixel MIPI DPHY + LVDS PHY combo IP
> as found on Freescale i.MX8qxp SoC.
>
> Cc: Guido Günther
> Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
> Cc: Vinod Koul
> Cc: Rob Herring
> Cc: NXP Linux Team
> Signed-off-by: Liu Ying
> ---
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 09:46:20AM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> This patch converts the mixel,mipi-dsi-phy binding to
> DT schema format using json-schema.
>
> Comparing to the plain text version, the new binding adds
> the 'assigned-clocks', 'assigned-clock-parents' and
> 'assigned-clock-rates' p
Userspace can set a damage clip with a negative coordinate, negative
width or height or larger than the plane.
This invalid values could cause issues in some HW or even worst enable
security flaws.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun
Cc: Sean Paul
Cc: Fabio Estevam
Cc: Deepak Rawat
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedes
Can you add some drm_dbg_atomic logs when the damage is invalid, to make it
easier for user-space to understand why an atomic commit failed?
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-deve
On Sun, 2020-12-13 at 17:22 +, Simon Ser wrote:
> Can you add some drm_dbg_atomic logs when the damage is invalid, to make it
> easier for user-space to understand why an atomic commit failed?
sure, this is enough? will wait for a couple of more days before send another
version.
diff --git
Userspace can set a damage clip with a negative coordinate, negative
width or height or larger than the plane.
This invalid values could cause issues in some HW or even worst enable
security flaws.
v2:
- add debug messages to let userspace know why atomic commit failed
due invalid damage clips
Cc
commit cf6d100dd238 ("drm/rockchip: dsi: add dual mipi support") added
this devcnt field and call to component_del(). However, these both
appear to be erroneous changes left over from an earlier version of the
patch. In the version merged, nothing ever modifies devcnt, meaning
component_del() runs
When we first enable the DSI encoder, we currently program some per-chip
configuration that we look up in rk3399_chip_data based on the device
tree compatible we match. This data configures various parameters of the
MIPI lanes, including on RK3399 whether DSI1 is slaved to DSI0 in a
dual-mode confi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201539
--- Comment #71 from mirh (m...@protonmail.ch) ---
Cool! This landed in 5.10.
By the way, I was wondering, is there any way to override the default minimum
20~26% minimum speed value?
I see that MinimumPWMLimit and zero rpm only landed with late
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
MAINTAINERS
between commit:
885743324513 ("crypto: keembay - Add support for Keem Bay OCS AES/SM4")
from the crypto tree and commit:
ed794057b052 ("drm/kmb: Build files for KeemBay Display driver")
from the drm tree.
Hi Jianxin,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on rdma/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on next-20201211]
[cannot apply to tegra-drm/drm/tegra/for-next v5.10]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch,
15 matches
Mail list logo