On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:38:29PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> In order to add meta-schema checks for additional/unevaluatedProperties
> being present, all schema need to make this explicit. As the top-level
> board/SoC schemas always have additional properties, add
> 'additionalProperties: true'.
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:38:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> In order to add meta-schema checks for additional/unevaluatedProperties
> being present, all schema need to make this explicit. As common/shared
> schema are included by other schemas, they should always allow for
> additionalProperties
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:38:30PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> In order to add meta-schema checks for additional/unevaluatedProperties
> being present, all schema need to make this explicit. As common/shared
> schema are included by other schemas, they should always allow for
> additionalPrope
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:43 PM Nikhil Devshatwar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to convert the upstream tidss drm driver to new
> connector model.
> The connector is getting created by the tidss driver and bridges are
> attached with flag DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR
> Here are some questio
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 4:47 PM Paul Cercueil wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le lun. 5 oct. 2020 à 16:05, Daniel Vetter a écrit :
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:01:50PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Paul,
> >>
> >> On Sun, 04 Oct 2020 22:11:23 +0200 Paul Cercueil
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Pushed
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:54 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:37 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 08:16:33PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > > kvm is some similar hack added for P2P DMA, see commit
> > > > add6a0cd1c5ba51b201e1361b05a5df817083618.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 7:15 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 03:15:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 10:55:52AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 4:05 AM Ville Syrjälä
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 01:52:56PM
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 01:38, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 4:27 PM Christian König
> wrote:
> >
> > Make it more clear what the resource manager function
> > does and nuke the wrapper function.
> >
> > v2: nuke the wrapper
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian König
>
> Reviewed-by:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:00 AM Qais Yousef wrote:
>
> +CC Steve and Peter - they might be interested.
>
> On 10/02/20 11:07, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 4:01 AM Qais Yousef wrote:
> > >
> > > On 09/30/20 14:17, Rob Clark wrote:
> > > > From: Rob Clark
> > > >
> > > > The android
From: Dave Airlie
Both fns checked mem == NULL, just move the check outside.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 3 ---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_resource.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
From: Dave Airlie
This will always do memcpy moves.
Acked-by: Christian König
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 21 +
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_h
I've just pulled out the few bits for making the move callback compulsory
from my previous series.
The vmwgfx ones need acks/r-bs, I've booted them in vmplayer and they
seem to work fine.
Dave.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.or
From: Dave Airlie
This just copies the fallback to vmwgfx, I'm going to iterate on this
a bit until it's not the same as the fallback path.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 19 ++-
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
From: Dave Airlie
v2: drop the wrapper struct
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c | 29 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_ttm.c
index 2c35ca4270c6..669bceb
From: Dave Airlie
All drivers should have a move callback now so make it compulsory.
Reviewed-by: Ben Skeggs
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Vetter
> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 6:49 AM
> To: Chrisanthus, Anitha
> Cc: Daniel Vetter ; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
> Paauwe, Bob J ; Dea, Edmund J
> ; Vetter, Daniel
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] drm/kmb: Add support for KeemBay Display
On 10/6/20 3:38 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> In order to add meta-schema checks for additional/unevaluatedProperties
> being present, all schema need to make this explicit. As common/shared
> schema are included by other schemas, they should always allow for
> additionalProperties.
>
> Signed-off-by:
Hi all,
I am trying to convert the upstream tidss drm driver to new
connector model.
The connector is getting created by the tidss driver and bridges are
attached with flag DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR
Here are some questions, regarding this:
1) Most of the info regarding bus_format and bus fla
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 11:20 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 6:24 PM Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 9:21 PM Rob Clark wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Rob Clark
> > >
> > > This doesn't remove *all* the struct_mutex, but it covers the worst
> > > of it, ie. s
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:47:47 -0300 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Andrew please let me know if you need a resend
Andrew is rather confused.
Can we please identify the minimal patch(es) which are needed for 5.9
and -stable?
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-dev
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 5:44 PM Hillf Danton wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:17:01 Kristian H. Kristensen wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 4:02 PM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:24:19PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 12:21:45
> > > >
Hi all,
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 23:01:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 04 Oct 2020 22:11:23 +0200 Paul Cercueil wrote:
> >
> > Pushed to drm-misc-next with the changelog fix, thanks.
> >
> > Stephen:
> > Now it should build fine again. Could you remove the BROKEN flag?
>
> Thanks for
On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 21:50 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap
>
> arch/arc/ implements BUG_ON() with BUG(). ARC has its own BUG()
> function and that function uses pr_warn() as part of its implementation.
>
> Several (8) files in amd/powerplay/ #undef various pr_xyz() functions so
On 05-10-20, 13:38, Rob Herring wrote:
> This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can
> check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present
> in schemas.
>
> 'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schema (via
> '$ref') and a
On 05-10-20, 13:38, Rob Herring wrote:
> In order to add meta-schema checks for additional/unevaluatedProperties
> being present, all schema need to make this explicit. As common/shared
> schema are included by other schemas, they should always allow for
> additionalProperties.
Acked-By: Vinod Kou
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 1:41 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 12:43:31AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > > iow I think I can outright delete the frame vector stuff.
> >
> > Ok this doesn't work, because dma_mmap always uses a remap_pfn_range,
> > which is a VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP
Hi Linus,
Daniel queued these up last week and I took a long weekend so didn't
get them out, but fixing the OOB access on get font seems like
something we should land and it's cc'ed stable as well. The other big
change is a partial revert for a regression on android on the clcd
fbdev driver, and o
On Mon, 05 Oct 2020, Rob Herring wrote:
> In order to add meta-schema checks for additional/unevaluatedProperties
> being present, all schema need to make this explicit. As common/shared
> schema are included by other schemas, they should always allow for
> additionalProperties.
Acked-by: Lee Jon
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
