Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/adreno: fix gpu probe if no interconnect-names

2020-07-15 Thread Jordan Crouse
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:07:30PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > From: Rob Clark > > If there is no interconnect-names, but there is an interconnects > property, then of_icc_get(dev, "gfx-mem"); would return an error > rather than NULL. > > Also, if there is no interconnect-names property, there wil

Re: [PATCHv1 1/4] dt-bindings: display: panel-dsi-cm: convert to YAML

2020-07-15 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:33:12 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Convert panel-dsi-cm bindings to YAML and add > missing properties while at it. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel > --- > .../bindings/display/panel/panel-dsi-cm.txt | 29 - > .../bindings/display/panel/panel-dsi-cm.yaml |

Re: [PATCH 0/8] drm/mgag200: Support desktop chips

2020-07-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 9:56 PM Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 00:59, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > > > This patchset puts device initialization in the correct order and > > adds support for G200 Desktop chips (PCI ids 0x520 and 0x521). > > why? :-) > > I'm pretty sure I NAKed the p

Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-binding: display: Allow a single port node on rocktech, jh057n00900

2020-07-15 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 13:47:17 +0200, Ondrej Jirman wrote: > The display has one port. Allow it in the binding. > > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/rocktech,jh057n00900.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring __

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: display: Fix example in nwl-dsi.yaml

2020-07-15 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 13:47:16 +0200, Ondrej Jirman wrote: > The example is now validated against rocktech,jh057n00900 schema > that was ported to yaml, and didn't validate with: > > - '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'port@0' do not match any of > the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > - 'vcc-supply' is

[pull] amdgpu drm-fixes-5.8

2020-07-15 Thread Alex Deucher
Hi Dave, Daniel, Fixes for 5.8. The following changes since commit 38794a5465b752118098e36cf95c59083f9f1f88: Merge tag 'amd-drm-fixes-5.8-2020-07-09' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux into drm-fixes (2020-07-10 07:02:02 +1000) are available in the Git repository at: git://peop

[PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: fix/enable 6bpc dither with split-lm

2020-07-15 Thread Rob Clark
From: Rob Clark If split-lm is used (for ex, on sdm845), we can have multiple ping- pongs, but only a single phys encoder. We need to configure dithering on each of them. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 22 ++- .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/

Re: [PATCH 0/8] drm/mgag200: Support desktop chips

2020-07-15 Thread Lyude Paul
Will try to look over this tomorrow, jfyi On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 16:58 +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > This patchset puts device initialization in the correct order and > adds support for G200 Desktop chips (PCI ids 0x520 and 0x521). > > The first 7 patches prepare the driver. Desktop chips woul

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7 amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-07-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 --- Comment #65 from Duncan (1i5t5.dun...@cox.net) --- (In reply to Duncan from comment #63) > NB: The 3202fa62f followups are cbfc35a48 and 89b83f282. That should let > anyone else with git and kernel building skills try reverting the three. >

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Ensure that ret is always initialized in icl_combo_phy_verify_state

2020-07-15 Thread Matt Roper
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:27:42PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > Clang warns: > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_combo_phy.c:268:3: warning: variable > 'ret' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized] > ret &= check_phy_reg(dev_priv, phy, ICL_PORT_TX_DW8_LN0(phy), >

Re: [PATCH 0/8] drm/mgag200: Support desktop chips

2020-07-15 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 15.07.20 um 21:56 schrieb Dave Airlie: > On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 00:59, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> >> This patchset puts device initialization in the correct order and >> adds support for G200 Desktop chips (PCI ids 0x520 and 0x521). > > why? :-) With G200 support in place, we can add als

Re: [PATCH 0/8] drm/mgag200: Support desktop chips

2020-07-15 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Am 16.07.20 um 07:44 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: > Hi > > Am 15.07.20 um 21:56 schrieb Dave Airlie: >> On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 00:59, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >>> >>> This patchset puts device initialization in the correct order and >>> adds support for G200 Desktop chips (PCI ids 0x520 and 0x521

[Bug 207383] [Regression] 5.7 amdgpu/polaris11 gpf: amdgpu_atomic_commit_tail

2020-07-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207383 Paul Menzel (pmenzel+bugzilla.kernel@molgen.mpg.de) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||

<    1   2