Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] dt-bindings: add simple DSI panels

2020-02-09 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Benjamin. On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 02:33:41PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > To complement panel-simple.yaml, create panel-simple-dsi.yaml. > panel-simple-dsi-yaml are for all simple DSP panels with a single > power-supply and optional backlight / enable GPIO / reset GPIO. > > Some DSI panel

Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] dt-bindings: display: add visionox rm69299 panel variant

2020-02-09 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Harigovindan On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 06:36:29PM +0530, Harigovindan P wrote: > Add bindings for visionox rm69299 panel. > > Signed-off-by: Harigovindan P > --- > > Changes in v1: > - Added a compatible string to support sc7180 panel version. > Changes in v2: > - Removed unwanted

Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple power domains

2020-02-09 Thread Nicolas Boichat
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 9:52 PM Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote: > > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pfdev->pm_domain_devs); i++) { > > + if (!pfdev->pm_domain_devs[i]) > > + break; (next time, please provide a tiny bit more context when quoting, I had to look up to see

Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple power domains

2020-02-09 Thread Nicolas Boichat
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:26 PM Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 06:27, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > > > > When there is a single power domain per device, the core will > > ensure the power domain is switched on (so it is technically > > equivalent to having not power domain specified at

[PATCH] nouveau: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2020-02-09 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Ben Skeggs Cc: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: nouv...@lists.freedeskt

Re: [PATCH] drm/tidss: dispc: Rewrite naive plane positioning code

2020-02-09 Thread Jyri Sarha
On 07/02/2020 20:45, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 08:26:17PM +0200, Jyri Sarha wrote: >> On 07/02/2020 20:18, Jyri Sarha wrote: >>> The old implementation of placing planes on the CRTC while configuring >>> the planes was naive and relied on the order in which the planes were >>>

[Bug 203905] amdgpu:actual_brightness has unreal/wrong value

2020-02-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203905 --- Comment #6 from Sandor Ecker (esa...@freemail.hu) --- So it seems that the 16 bit actual_brightness is not a bug, but a feature... :) https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/262485a50fd4532a8d71165190adc7a0a19bcc9e#diff-b496037255b7766a782d3

[Bug 205675] Display locks up. AMDGPU timeout

2020-02-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205675 --- Comment #3 from freddyrei...@comcast.net --- Update. Roughly around the time of the last update to this, I manually added that fix and it was working out for me. However, I ran some updates to both mesa and the kernel itself and now it appears

[Bug 205675] Display locks up. AMDGPU timeout

2020-02-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205675 --- Comment #4 from freddyrei...@comcast.net --- Created attachment 287263 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=287263&action=edit Newer dmesg tail from a lockup on 5.5.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching th

[Bug 205675] Display locks up. AMDGPU timeout

2020-02-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205675 freddyrei...@comcast.net changed: What|Removed |Added Kernel Version|5.4.0 |5.5.2 -- You are receiving th

Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: add binding for tft displays based on ilitek,ili9486

2020-02-09 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Kamlesh. On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 11:36:26PM +0530, Kamlesh Gurudasani wrote: > This binding is for the tft displays based on ilitek,ili9486. > ozzmaker,piscreen and waveshare,rpi-lcd-35 are such displays > > Signed-off-by: Kamlesh Gurudasani > --- > > v2 changes: > * Changing file from txt t

Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/tiny: add support for tft displays based on ilitek,ili9486

2020-02-09 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Kamlesh. Thanks for the quick respin. checkpatch was not too happy with this driver. For DRM we use --strict. I fixed it up like this whiel applying: diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ili9486.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ili9486.c index e960b16c05d6..5084b38c1a71 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/

[Bug 206475] New: amdgpu under load drop signal to monitor until hard reset

2020-02-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206475 Bug ID: 206475 Summary: amdgpu under load drop signal to monitor until hard reset Product: Drivers Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 5.5.2 Hardware: All OS:

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/tiny/repaper: Make driver OF-independent

2020-02-09 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Andy. On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:49:22PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > There is one OF call in the driver that limits its area of use. > Replace it to generic device_get_match_data() and get rid of OF dependency. > > While here, cast SPI driver data to certain enumerator type. > > Cc: Noral

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: more locking for ppgtt mm LRU list

2020-02-09 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2020.02.03 15:07:01 +, Igor Druzhinin wrote: > When the lock was introduced in 72aabfb862e40 ("drm/i915/gvt: Add mutual > lock for ppgtt mm LRU list") one place got lost. > > Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c | 4 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >

Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Ensure the cursor plane is on top of other overlays

2020-02-09 Thread CK Hu
Hi, Sean: On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 11:27 +0800, CK Hu wrote: > Hi, Sean: > > On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 14:24 -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > > From: Sean Paul > > > > Currently the cursor is placed on the first overlay plane, which means > > it will be at the bottom of the stack when the hw does the composi

Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: Find the cursor plane instead of hard coding it

2020-02-09 Thread CK Hu
Hi, Evan: On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 16:34 +0800, CK Hu wrote: > Hi, Evan: > > On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 15:23 +1100, Evan Benn wrote: > > The cursor and primary planes were hard coded. > > Now search for them for passing to drm_crtc_init_with_planes > > > > Reviewed-by: CK Hu Applied to mediatek-drm-

Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Add dts for mt8183 GPU (and misc panfrost patches)

2020-02-09 Thread Nicolas Boichat
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 4:13 PM Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > On 2/7/20 8:42 AM, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Tomeu Vizoso > > wrote: > >> > >>> Some more changes are still required to get devfreq working, and of course > >>> I do not have a userspace driver to test this wi

[PATCH v6] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add A618 gpu dt blob

2020-02-09 Thread Sharat Masetty
This patch adds the required dt nodes and properties to enabled A618 GPU. Signed-off-by: Sharat Masetty --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 102 +++ 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/

[PATCH v6] sc7180: Add A618 GPU bindings

2020-02-09 Thread Sharat Masetty
I used this branch qcom/arm64-for-5.6-to-be-rebased as suggested by Matthias. This patch needs the clock patches and the clock patches have not yet landed, so please apply the following series and patches in order a) All patches from https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-clk/list/?series=203

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] drm: Add support for Cadence MHDP DPI/DP bridge and J721E wrapper.

2020-02-09 Thread Jyri Sarha
On 06/02/2020 08:29, Yuti Amonkar wrote: > This patch series adds new DRM driver for Cadence Display Port. > The Cadence Display Port is also referred as MHDP (Mobile High > Definition Link, High-Definition Multimedia Interface Display > Port) Cadence Display Port complies with VESA DisplayPort (DP