https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100189
--- Comment #1 from Javi Ballester Tomás ---
mpv only crashes when fullscreen on start is activated in mpv.conf (fs=yes).
blender crashes also with segfault:
# Blender 2.78 (sub 0), Commit date: 2017-02-24 14:33, Hash e92f2352830
# ba
Hi Russell,
On 13-03-2017 13:10, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:55:58PM +, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 13-03-2017 09:36, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:27:08AM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On 03/10/2017 10:35 AM, Roma
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100189
--- Comment #2 from Emil Velikov ---
Hi Javi, I don't think we have many devs looking at the i915 driver.
If you can track down the commit that introduced the regression (considering it
is one) or write a simple test program that will be apprec
This contains one libdrm patch and 4 kernel patches.
The goal is to implement the Vulkan KHR_external_semaphore_fd interface
for permanent semaphore behaviour for radv.
This code tries to enhance sync file to add the required behaviour
(which is mostly being able to replace the fence backing the
From: Dave Airlie
This adds the corresponding code for libdrm to use the new
kernel interfaces for semaphores.
This will be used by radv to implement shared semaphores.
TODO: Version checks.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 28 +
amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 1
From: Dave Airlie
Using sync_file to back vulkan semaphores means need to replace
the fence underlying the sync file. This replace function removes
the callback, swaps the fence, and returns the old one. This
also exports the alloc and fdget functionality for the semaphore
wrapper code.
Signed-o
From: Dave Airlie
This just splits out the fence depenency checking into it's
own function to make it easier to add semaphore dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 86 +++---
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 38 deleti
From: Dave Airlie
This creates a new interface for amdgpu with ioctls to
create/destroy/import and export shared semaphores using
sem object backed by the sync_file code. The semaphores
are not installed as fd (except for export), but rather
like other driver internal objects in an idr. The idr
h
From: Dave Airlie
This isn't needed currently, but to reuse sync file for Vulkan
permanent shared semaphore semantics, we need to be able to swap
the fence backing a sync file. This patch adds a mutex to the
sync file and uses to protect accesses to the fence and cb members.
Signed-off-by: Dave
Merged.
Thanks.
2017년 03월 12일 03:04에 Krzysztof Kozlowski 이(가) 쓴 글:
> Support for Exynos4415 is going away because there are no internal nor
> external users.
>
> Since commit 46dcf0ff0de3 ("ARM: dts: exynos: Remove exynos4415.dtsi"),
> the platform cannot be instantiated so remove also the drive
Hi Andrzej,
Thanks for fixing this.
As you mentioned, this patch set depends on Shawn patch set[1].
So can you separate this patch series into two sets?
One includes only the patch set related to fixing page fault issue and other
includes cleanup code based on Shawn patchset.
I'd like to merge
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99841
--- Comment #13 from Michel Dänzer ---
Created attachment 130207
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=130207&action=edit
Only reject if FBINFO_MISC_USEREVENT is set
Does this patch (only compile tested) help?
--
You are receivi
Hi Dave,
Could you tell me why you create your new one patch? I remember I send
out our the whole implementation, Why not directly review our patches?
Thanks,
David Zhou
On 2017年03月14日 08:50, Dave Airlie wrote:
From: Dave Airlie
This adds the corresponding code for libdrm to use the new
ke
On 14 March 2017 at 12:00, zhoucm1 wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Could you tell me why you create your new one patch? I remember I send out
> our the whole implementation, Why not directly review our patches?
This is patch review, I'm not sure what you are expecting in terms of
direct review.
The patche
On 2017年03月14日 10:52, Dave Airlie wrote:
On 14 March 2017 at 12:00, zhoucm1 wrote:
Hi Dave,
Could you tell me why you create your new one patch? I remember I send out
our the whole implementation, Why not directly review our patches?
This is patch review, I'm not sure what you are expecting
On 14 March 2017 at 13:30, zhoucm1 wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年03月14日 10:52, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> On 14 March 2017 at 12:00, zhoucm1 wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> Could you tell me why you create your new one patch? I remember I send
>>> out
>>> our the whole implementation, Why not directly revie
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
