[git pull] drm tree for 4.2

On 26 June 2015 at 18:05, Christian König wrote: > Hey Dave, > > I'm not 100% sure, but didn't you wanted to send this pull request out for > drm-next-merged instead of drm-next? > > Cause I'm still getting merge conflicts when I try to merge 4.1 into > drm-next. No generally Linus likes to do h

[PATCH] gpu/drm/amdgpu: Fix build when CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set

If the CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not selected, compilation of the drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c provides two warnings that amdgpu_debugfs_regs_init and amdgpu_debugfs_regs_cleanup are used but never defined. And as result: ERROR: "amdgpu_debugfs_regs_cleanup" [drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdg

[Bug 61529] [r600g][kms][ATI RV710] r600_pcie_gart_tlb_flush+0xf5/0x110

(plus radeon.dpm=0). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150627/c25795b1/attachment.html>

[Bug 100541] Since 4.1, the mouse cursor is corrupted after suspend/resume

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100541 --- Comment #2 from Christian Casteyde --- It was only a kernel update. I bisected it: b9729b17a414f99c61f4db9ac9f9ed987fa0cbfe is the first bad commit commit b9729b17a414f99c61f4db9ac9f9ed987fa0cbfe Author: Maarten Lankhorst Date: Tue Jan 13

[Bug 61529] [r600g][kms][ATI RV710] r600_pcie_gart_tlb_flush+0xf5/0x110

this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20150627/c2e42bc4/attachment.html>

[PATCH] drm/bridge: ps8622: Delete a check before backlight_device_unregister()

From: Markus Elfring Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 20:44:49 +0200 The backlight_device_unregister() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by: Markus Elf

[PATCH 1/2] drm/msm/dsi: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "dsi_destroy"

From: Markus Elfring Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 22:05:31 +0200 The dsi_destroy() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring --- drive

[PATCH] GPU-DRM-Exynos: Delete unnecessary checks before two function calls

>> From: Markus Elfring >> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 21:54:45 +0100 >> >> The functions phy_power_on() and vunmap() perform also input >> parameter validation. Thus the test around their calls is not needed. >> >> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus El

[PATCH 0/2] drm/msm/dsi: Deletion of an unnecessary check

From: Markus Elfring Further update suggestions were taken into account after a patch was applied from static source code analysis. Markus Elfring (2): Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "dsi_destroy" One function call less in dsi_init() after error detection drivers/gpu/

[PATCH 2/2] drm/msm/dsi: One function call less in dsi_init() after error detection

From: Markus Elfring Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 22:23:28 +0200 The dsi_destroy() function was called in two cases by the dsi_init() function during error handling even if the passed variable contained a null pointer. * This implementation detail could be improved by adjustments for jump targets ac