[Bug 66243] X display is shifted upwards on GMA500

2013-06-27 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130627/d1d78111/attachment.html>

[PULL] drm/tegra: Changes for v3.11-rc1

2013-06-27 Thread Thierry Reding
t available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130627/635f49cc/attachment.pgp>

[Bug 63599] [r600][r600] GPU lockup CP stall (kernel 3.2.47, 3.4, 3.8, 3.9)

2013-06-27 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130627/f2fa9cf1/attachment.html>

[Bug 65873] R600/SI: Cannot select store with truncate to 32-bit

2013-06-27 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130627/c02aa336/attachment.html>

[PATCH WW 01/13] reservation: cross-device reservation support, v4

2013-06-27 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:48:16PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > This adds support for a generic reservations framework that can be > hooked up to ttm and dma-buf and allows easy sharing of reservations > across devices. > > The idea is that a dma-buf and ttm object both will get a pointer > t

[PATCH WW 02/13] drm/ttm: make ttm reservation calls behave like reservation calls

2013-06-27 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:48:17PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > This commit converts the source of the val_seq counter to > the ww_mutex api. The reservation objects are converted later, > because there is still a lockdep splat in nouveau that has to > resolved first. > > Signed-off-by: Maart

[PATCH WW 04/13] drm/ttm: convert to the reservation api

2013-06-27 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:48:19PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Now that the code is compatible in semantics, flip the switch. > Use ww_mutex instead of the homegrown implementation. > > ww_mutex uses -EDEADLK to signal that the caller has to back off, > and -EALREADY to indicate this buffer

[PATCH WW 08/13] drm/radeon: inline reservations

2013-06-27 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:48:23PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 23 --- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.h | 22 +- > 2 files changed,

[PATCH WW 11/13] drm/radeon: get rid of ttm_bo_is_reserved usage

2013-06-27 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:48:26PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Try to use lockdep_assert_held or other alternatives where possible. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 8 ++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_o

[Bug 65873] R600/SI: Cannot select store with truncate to 32-bit

2013-06-27 Thread bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130627/3b9d5c9b/attachment.html>

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread James Cloos
> "AD" == Alex Deucher writes: AD> Nope. 6xx and APUs do not require ucode. only 7xx+ dGPUs. Does that mean that APUs do not require *any* ucode blobs? Or just that they do not require updated or additional blobs for the new functionality like DPM? -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP:

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:19 PM, James Cloos wrote: >> "AD" == Alex Deucher writes: > > AD> Nope. 6xx and APUs do not require ucode. only 7xx+ dGPUs. > > Does that mean that APUs do not require *any* ucode blobs? > > Or just that they do not require updated or additional blobs > for the new

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Andy Furniss wrote: > Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:21 AM, wrote: >>> >>> From: Alex Deucher >>> >>> These are the radeon patches for 3.11. Some of these patches >>> are huge so, it might be easier to review things here: >>> http://cgit.fr

[pull] radeon drm-next-3.11

2013-06-27 Thread alexdeuc...@gmail.com
From: Alex Deucher Hi Dave, This is the pull request for radeon for 3.11. Highlights include: - Support for CIK (Sea Islands) asics: 3D, compute, UVD - DPM (Dynamic Power Management) support for 6xx-SI - ASPM support for 6xx-SI - Assorted bug fixes DPM is disabled by default for now until it

[PATCH 069/165] drm/radeon/kms: add common dpm infrastructure

2013-06-27 Thread K. Schnass
Thanks for the work the whole thing seems to work fine on my RV770, although I cannot really say if does anything as I found no way to query the current clk or voltage?! There is one little gripe though, the rest of the code uses DRM_INFO() for printing whereas this series uses plain printk() re

Packard Bell EasyNote LV need i915.invert_brightness=1

2013-06-27 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Daniel Vetter] > The buttons might do something fancy behind the scenes (kernel or > userspace), so can you please also check whether directly changing > the backlight values in /sys/class/backlight works correctly? There is full brightness when I set the value of max_brightness into the brightne

Ugly lockdep trace after radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Hello. I have cloned Linus' tree, then pulled from git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux and built the kernel. However, I forgot to install the now-required radeon/TURKS_smc.bin firmware file. The result is an ugly lockdep trace (please ignore Sony firmware bug): [ 39.693862] radeon :16

[PATCH 000/165] radeon drm-next patches

2013-06-27 Thread Julian Wollrath
Hi, > This patch should fix your issue : > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/0001-radeon-do-no-schedule-thermal-work-if-dpm-is-not-ena.patch > yes, that seems to do the trick (but I can not be 100% sure, since I only saw the warning once). > > Cheers, > Jerome Best regards, Julian

<    1   2   3