2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> encoder's mode_set callback isn't specific to hardware so it doesn't
>> need to call exynos_drm_encoder_dpms().
>
>
> Then, where is exynos_drm_encoder_dpms() called?
>
with this patch series, exynos_drm_encoder_dpms() will
On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
> the values set to registers will be updated into real registers
> at vsync so dma operation could be malfunctioned when accessed
> to memory after gem buffer was released. this patch makes sure
> that hw overlay is disabled before the gem buffer is released
2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> this patch adds buf_cnt variable in exynos_drm_fb structure and
>> that means a buffer count to drm framebuffer and also adds two
>> functions to get/set the buffer count from/to exynos_drm_fb structure.
>> if pixel format i
2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> this patch changes ctx variable name in exynos_drm_hdmi_context
>> structure to client because the use of ctx variable makes it confused.
>
>
> I don't prefer "client" name. This is not client and server relationship.
>
Oka
2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> crtc and encoder's dpms callback will be called before connector's dpms
>> is called so drm_helper_connector_dpms doesn't need to be called.
>
>
> I can't understand this description. I know crtc and encoder dpms are called
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43655
--- Comment #19 from Alexandre Demers
2012-08-20 03:00:22 UTC ---
Fixed by attachment 64759 (proposed in bug 42373 which is similar to this bug
but is not the same since it is not fixed by the attachment)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.fre
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42373
--- Comment #31 from Alexandre Demers
2012-08-20 03:01:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Created attachment 64759 [details] [review]
> Fixup mc programing
>
> This patch should fix your issue.
This patch doesn't apply correctly on kernel
2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
> On 08/20/2012 10:52 AM, InKi Dae wrote:
>>
>> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>>>
>>> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
this patch separates sub driver's probe call and encoder/connector
creation
so that exynos drm core module can take exception whe
On 08/20/2012 01:31 PM, InKi Dae wrote:
> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>> On 08/20/2012 10:52 AM, InKi Dae wrote:
>>> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
> this patch separates sub driver's probe call and encoder/connector
> creation
> so that exynos dr
On 08/20/2012 11:23 AM, InKi Dae wrote:
> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>> this patch adds buf_cnt variable in exynos_drm_fb structure and
>>> that means a buffer count to drm framebuffer and also adds two
>>> functions to get/set the buffer count from/to ex
On 08/20/2012 11:29 AM, InKi Dae wrote:
> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>> this patch changes ctx variable name in exynos_drm_hdmi_context
>>> structure to client because the use of ctx variable makes it confused.
>>
>> I don't prefer "client" name. This is
2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
> On 08/20/2012 11:23 AM, InKi Dae wrote:
>>
>> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>>>
>>> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
this patch adds buf_cnt variable in exynos_drm_fb structure and
that means a buffer count to drm framebuffer and also adds two
fu
sorry, again.
2012/8/20 InKi Dae :
> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>> On 08/20/2012 11:23 AM, InKi Dae wrote:
>>>
>>> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>
> this patch adds buf_cnt variable in exynos_drm_fb structure and
> that means a buffer coun
On 08/20/2012 02:15 PM, InKi Dae wrote:
> sorry, again.
>
> 2012/8/20 InKi Dae :
>> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>>> On 08/20/2012 11:23 AM, InKi Dae wrote:
2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>> this patch adds buf_cnt variable in exynos_drm_fb structure
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/17/12 15:55, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Randy Dunlap
>>> wrote:
On 08/17/2012 03:25 PM, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
> for , we have verifi
c: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120820/a98d20af/attachment.pgp>
2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
> On 08/20/2012 01:31 PM, InKi Dae wrote:
>>
>> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>>>
>>> On 08/20/2012 10:52 AM, InKi Dae wrote:
2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>
> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> this patch separates sub driver's probe call a
2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
> On 08/20/2012 02:15 PM, InKi Dae wrote:
>>
>> sorry, again.
>>
>> 2012/8/20 InKi Dae :
>>>
>>> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
On 08/20/2012 11:23 AM, InKi Dae wrote:
>
> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>>
>> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>
2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
> On 08/20/2012 11:29 AM, InKi Dae wrote:
>>
>> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>>>
>>> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
this patch changes ctx variable name in exynos_drm_hdmi_context
structure to client because the use of ctx variable makes it confused.
On 08/20/2012 03:17 PM, InKi Dae wrote:
> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>> On 08/20/2012 11:29 AM, InKi Dae wrote:
>>> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
> this patch changes ctx variable name in exynos_drm_hdmi_context
> structure to client because the use
2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
> On 08/20/2012 03:17 PM, InKi Dae wrote:
>>
>> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>>>
>>> On 08/20/2012 11:29 AM, InKi Dae wrote:
2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>
> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>
>> this patch changes ctx variable name in exynos
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> From: Damien Lespiau
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c |3 ---
> include/drm/drm_crtc.h |2 --
> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gp
2012/8/20 InKi Dae :
> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>> On 08/20/2012 03:17 PM, InKi Dae wrote:
>>>
>>> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
On 08/20/2012 11:29 AM, InKi Dae wrote:
>
> 2012/8/20 Joonyoung Shim :
>>
>> On 08/17/2012 06:50 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
>>>
>>> this patch c
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41265
--- Comment #51 from gyhor at gmx.de 2012-08-20 07:32:20 UTC ---
With this xorg.conf i can use two external monitor connected to the
dockingstation.
Additionally the internal screen of the notebook is in textmode.
--
$cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Sectio
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46241
Summary: Resume to black screen on AMD A8-3500m/Radeon 6620G
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: Linux version 3.6.0-030600rc1-generic (apw at gomeisa)
(gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Li
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46241
--- Comment #1 from Geoffrey Teale
2012-08-20 07:42:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=77941)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=77941)
lspci
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46241
--- Comment #2 from Geoffrey Teale
2012-08-20 07:43:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=77951)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=77951)
modules
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46241
--- Comment #3 from Geoffrey Teale
2012-08-20 07:44:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=77961)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=77961)
ver_linux
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46241
--- Comment #4 from Geoffrey Teale
2012-08-20 07:44:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=77971)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=77971)
io
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46241
--- Comment #5 from Geoffrey Teale
2012-08-20 07:55:10 ---
Sorry, should look like this:
[1.] Lenovo E525 screen black on resume
[2.] My setup is a Lenovo Thinkpad E525, AMD A8-3500m/Radeon 6620G Llano
series APU. I am running Ubuntu 12.04,
From: Jerome Glisse
Virtual address need to be fenced to know when we can safely remove it.
This patch also properly clear the pagetable. Previously it was
serouisly broken.
Kernel 3.5/3.4 need a similar patch but adapted for difference in mutex locking.
v2: For to update pagetable when unbindi
Second and hopefully last round for this patchset.
v2: Fix suspend/resume, and incorporate Jeromes comments.
Cheers,
Christian.
Store a reference to the VM into the IB structure, that
makes calculating the IBs address a bit less complicated.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c |5 +++--
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r100.c|2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/rade
So it looks more like the rest of the driver.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 35 +---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c | 50 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c
It actually isn't very useful.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c | 11 ---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h |2 --
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c |3 ---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gart.c |1 -
d
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
index 0a9d1eb..85a80e4 100644
---
Move flushing the VMs as function into the rings.
First step to make VM operations async.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c | 31 ---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h |6 --
drivers/gpu/dr
Removing the need to wait for anything.
Still not ideal, since we need to free pt on va remove.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h |4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c | 28 +
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gar
Move binding onto the ring, simplifying handling a bit.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c| 20 ++---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h| 30 +++-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c |9 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/r
Makes it easier to move it into the rings.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c | 22 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 12 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_asic.c |3 ---
drivers/gpu/drm
From: Jerome Glisse
Make sure that the ib bo is bound and is page table is up to date
in the virtual address space.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse
Reviewed-by: Christian K?nig
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c |5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rade
Currently doing the update with the CP.
v2: Rebased on Jeromes bugfix. Make validity comparison
more human readable.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c | 20 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/nid.h |1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
t attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120820/02d5305e/attachment.pgp>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:51:10AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> I've gathered up the various outstanding radeon patches and put them
> up in a tree for testing:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.7-wip
> Some of these may end up in -fixes, but most of them are -next
> mate
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Paul Menzel
wrote:
> Dear Marek,
>
>
> thank you for all your work on MSAA.
>
>
> Am Sonntag, den 19.08.2012, 21:23 +0200 schrieb Marek Ol??k:
>
> Unfortunately you do not provide any commit message. What is the problem
> and what are the symptoms? When was it intr
when remove callback of exynos_drm_subdrv is called, it could need
device object for sub driver to control things specific to hw such as
runtime pm.
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.h |2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fim
Hello all,
Changelog v2:
. fixed duplicated mode setting.
- this patch includes below three patches of v1 and fixes
the issue that drm_helper_connector_dpms() isn't called.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg26427.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg26428.ht
this patch separates exynos_drm_subdrv_probe function into sub driver's probe
call
and encoder/connector creation so that exynos drm core module can take exception
when some operation was failed properly.
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_dr
do not align in page unit at dumb creation. the align is done
by exynos_drm_gem_create() to be called commonly.
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/
this patch separetes fimd_power_on into fimd_activate and fimd_clock and
fimd_activate function will call fimd_clock to control fimd power and
vsync interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c | 60 --
this patch fixes that when drm_crtc_helper_set_mode() is called,
mode data for hardware overlay and conntroller are updated two times.
for example, in case that drm_crtc_helper_set_mode() is called,
overlay_ops->commit() and manager_ops->commit() callbacks can be called
two times, first at drm_crtc
this patch adds buf_cnt variable in exynos_drm_fb structure and
that means a buffer count to drm framebuffer and also adds two
functions to get/set the buffer count from/to exynos_drm_fb structure.
if pixel format is not DRM_FORMAT_NV12MT then it gets a buffer count
to drm framebuffer refering to m
this interface can be used to make sure that hardware overlay is disabled
to avoid that memory region is accessed by dma after gem buffer was released.
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.h | 17 +
drivers/gpu/drm/
the values set to registers will be updated into real registers
at vsync so dma operation could be malfunctioned when accessed
to memory after gem buffer was released. this patch makes sure
that hw overlay is disabled before the gem buffer is released.
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae
Signed-off-by: Kyung
if old_crtc isn't same as encoder->crtc then it means that
user changed crtc id to another one so a plane to old_crtc
should be disabled so that current plane can be updated safely
and plane->crtc should be set to new crtc(encoder->crtc)
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
the values set to registers will be updated into real registers
at vsync so dma operation could be malfunctioned when accessed
to memory after gem buffer was released. this patch makes sure
that hw overlay is disabled before the gem buffer is released.
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae
Signed-off-by: Kyung
Nobody uses it, so might as well simplify the code some.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index 36f4b28..ddfe393 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ static voi
Reset the lockup timeout on ring (re-)initialisation.
Otherwise we get error messages like this on gpu resets:
[ 1559.949177] radeon :01:00.0: GPU lockup CP stall for more than
1482270msec
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
cc: stable at kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ring.c |
How is this different from just calling with no_wait == false?
As far as I can tell, both paths end up with the same result..
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
index 3f48a46..4e7b596 100644
--- a/drivers
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53512
almos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42373
--- Comment #32 from Alex Deucher 2012-08-20 14:03:44 UTC
---
A similar patch is already upstream:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=81ee8fb6b52ec69eeed37fe7943446af1dccecc5
--
Configure bugmail: https
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 15:38 +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
> Reset the lockup timeout on ring (re-)initialisation.
>
> Otherwise we get error messages like this on gpu resets:
> [ 1559.949177] radeon :01:00.0: GPU lockup CP stall for more than
> 1482270msec
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:51:10AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> I've gathered up the various outstanding radeon patches and put them
>> up in a tree for testing:
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.7-wip
>> Some o
From: Alan Cox
If you do a page flip with no flags set then event is NULL. If event is
NULL then the vmw_gfx driver likes to go digging into NULL and extracts
NULL->base.file_priv.
On a modern kernel with NULL mapping protection it's just another oops,
without it there are some "intriguing" poss
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
---
drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus_drv.h |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus_drv.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus_drv.h
index 64ea597..5d04564 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/cirrus/cirrus_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/c
The removed member is unneeded, an extra pass is done after all
buffers have been reserved. The behavior stays the same even without
the removed member, but this makes the code slightly more readable.
Depends on previous 2 execbuf-util patches.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
---
drivers/gpu/d
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_drv.h |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_drv.h
index d4af9ed..20a437f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_drv.h
@@ -94,7 +94
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
---
drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h
index 6f13b35..d22cbbf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/g
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Marek Ol??k wrote:
>> Please can someone tell me if this patch will end up in kernel 3.6 or 3.7.
>>
>> If it is merged in Linus's tree in the coming days, I'll try to
>> complete R600-R700 MSAA support (and the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46241
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Kernel Version|Li
There is a more recent APU stepping with a new PCI ID
shipping in the same board by Fujitsu which needs the
same quirk to correctly mark the back plane connectors.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
---
radeon_atombios.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46241
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeucher at gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30812
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30922
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53111
--- Comment #15 from Michel D?nzer 2012-08-20 14:59:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Well, it seems running it through qapitrace doesn't lock.
The apitrace looks incomplete: it doesn't contain any actual rendering
operations.
--
Configu
- Original Message -
> From: Alan Cox
>
> If you do a page flip with no flags set then event is NULL. If event
> is NULL then the vmw_gfx driver likes to go digging into NULL and
> extracts NULL->base.file_priv.
>
> On a modern kernel with NULL mapping protection it's just another
> oops
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53111
--- Comment #16 from Alexandre Demers
2012-08-20 15:05:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > Well, it seems running it through qapitrace doesn't lock.
>
> The apitrace looks incomplete: it doesn't contain any actu
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31502
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Component|Ot
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31502
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeucher at gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31682
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31712
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> How is this different from just calling with no_wait == false?
> As far as I can tell, both paths end up with the same result..
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
NAK this seriously modify the behavior. The ttm_eu_del_from_lru_locked
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> Nobody uses it, so might as well simplify the code some.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index 36f4b28..ddfe393 100644
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31892
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31972
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> The removed member is unneeded, an extra pass is done after all
> buffers have been reserved. The behavior stays the same even without
> the removed member, but this makes the code slightly more readable.
>
> Depends on previous 2 execbu
From: David Lamparter
This is required for pure UEFI systems. The vbios is stored
in ACPI rather than at the legacy vga location.
Fixes:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26891
V2: fix #ifdefs as per Greg's comments
V3: fix it harder
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Reviewed-by: Jerome
From: Alex Deucher
We need it in the radeon drm module to fetch
and verify the vbios image on UEFI systems.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxface.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/t
From: Alex Deucher
Allows us to verify the table size.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_bios.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_bios.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon
From: Alex Deucher
There are systems that use ATRM, but not ATPX.
Fixes:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41265
V2: fix #ifdefs as per Greg's comments
V3: fix it harder
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h |
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32072
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32162
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Video(AGP) |Video(DRI - non Intel)
AssignedTo|airlied
I am not sure whether this is needed, but better be safe than sorry.
---
radeon/radeon_surface.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/radeon/radeon_surface.c b/radeon/radeon_surface.c
index 98f4aaf..4118a37 100644
--- a/radeon/radeon_surface.c
+++ b/radeon/radeon_
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32162
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeucher at gmail.com
--- Comment #
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:31:04AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> + /*
> + * For secondary graphics devices shouldn't be initialized
> + * until the handler and primary graphics device have been
> + * registered with vga_switcheroo.
> + *
> + * FIXME: Is vga_default_devic
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33512
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33912
Alan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:56:33AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 04:36:40PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Won't this break the multiple cards with independent outputs case?
>
> Yes, if they don't have a switcheroo handler. I only have experience
> with one such machine,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:24:44AM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> I'm not sure how we support both of these cases without doing something
> more like what I originally proposed, i.e. registering the LVDS
> connector even if it doesn't look like a panel is attached. I still
> honestly favor that appr
Hey,
Op 20-08-12 17:15, Jerome Glisse schreef:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>> How is this different from just calling with no_wait == false?
>> As far as I can tell, both paths end up with the same result..
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
> NAK this serio
101 - 200 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
