Hi Dave,
A few important fixes for 3.5
- revert for the 3.4 black screen DP regression
- fix for the excessive dmesg noise due to a eDP vdd problem, reported by
Linus. This turned out to be a 3.5 regression.
- vga hpd handling fix, try 2. Commit contains an elaborate explanation of
why the pre
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12796
--- Comment #2 from Anonymous Emailer
2012-06-16 13:15:06 ---
Reply-To: vinc...@zweije.nl
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 02:20:06PM +,
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
|| https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12796
|| > irq
> why the previous thing blew up for Linus and why this one shouldn't, so
> I think we can risk this ;-)
yeah no, you get one go at that, I'm no more detection fixed in -fixes
ever again, unless they are a pure revert.
The detection logic is just to flaky and impossible to test on enough
s
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 02:16:29PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> > why the previous thing blew up for Linus and why this one shouldn't, so
> > I think we can risk this ;-)
>
> yeah no, you get one go at that, I'm no more detection fixed in -fixes
> ever again, unless they are a pure revert.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42373
--- Comment #15 from Reartes Guillermo 2012-06-16 14:28:55
PDT ---
Regarding:
AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT device=01:00.0 domain=0x0016
address=0x000f002e9000 flags=0x0010]
(RH BZ: 827123)
I do get those from time to time with CAI
From: Dave Airlie
This is ported from udlfb.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832188
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl_drv.c b/drivers/g
Hi Dave,
A few important fixes for 3.5
- revert for the 3.4 black screen DP regression
- fix for the excessive dmesg noise due to a eDP vdd problem, reported by
Linus. This turned out to be a 3.5 regression.
- vga hpd handling fix, try 2. Commit contains an elaborate explanation of
why the pre
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12796
--- Comment #2 from Anonymous Emailer
2012-06-16 13:15:06 ---
Reply-To: vincent at zweije.nl
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 02:20:06PM +,
bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
|| https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12796
||
> why the previous thing blew up for Linus and why this one shouldn't, so
> I think we can risk this ;-)
yeah no, you get one go at that, I'm no more detection fixed in -fixes
ever again, unless they are a pure revert.
The detection logic is just to flaky and impossible to test on enough
s
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 02:16:29PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> > why the previous thing blew up for Linus and why this one shouldn't, so
> > I think we can risk this ;-)
>
> yeah no, you get one go at that, I'm no more detection fixed in -fixes
> ever again, unless they are a pure revert.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42373
--- Comment #15 from Reartes Guillermo 2012-06-16
14:28:55 PDT ---
Regarding:
AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT device=01:00.0 domain=0x0016
address=0x000f002e9000 flags=0x0010]
(RH BZ: 827123)
I do get those from time to time with CAI
It is more readable by printing "ret = -1" than "ret = 0x"
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
index 8a9d079..946bd91 100644
--- a/drivers/
12 matches
Mail list logo
