Two things I've noticed:
- Why not dev->mode_config.mutex? I was under the impression that
mode_config.mutex protects most of the modesetting state and
dev->struct_mutex protects things related to the gpu execution cores
(i.e. all things gem), with struct_mutex nested within
mode_config.mutex. It's
queue_delayed_work? Plays nicer with other workqueue-items.
-Daniel
PS: Scrap my other mail, just noticed that the merged patched r-b'ed
by Jesse uses the mode_config mutex.
--
Daniel Vetter
daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch - +41 (0) 79 364 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
Hi Linus,
Main drm pull request for -rc1, main highlights,
Nouveau: open source fermi ucode, per-client gpu address spaces for nv50
and up.
Intel: FBC cleanups (on by default now), high color support, ring
frequency scaling, shared LLC support, and hangcheck module disabling.
radeon: initial c
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35697
Nikos Chantziaras changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> From 59b920597999381fab70c485c161dd50590e561a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Keith Packard
> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:37:51 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] Revert and fix "drm/i915/dp: remove DPMS mode tracking from
> DP"
>
> This reverts commi
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:34 AM, wrote:
> From: Thomas Reim
>
> ECS A740GM-M with ATI RADEON 2100 sends data to i2c bus
> for a DVI connector that is not implemented/existent on the board.
>
> Fix by applying extented DDC probing for this connector.
>
> Requires [PATCH] drm/radeon: Fix A
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:10:53AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:08:14AM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:50:04PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> >
> >> > You're right, of course -- UMS i
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:30 PM, wrote:
>> From: Thomas Reim
Guys I really still hate this :-)
Other OSes must deal with this sort of thing and I can't say they
don't do it like this but I can't say for certain this feels like the
right ans
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:30 PM, wrote:
>>> From: Thomas Reim
>
> Guys I really still hate this :-)
>
> Other OSes must deal with this sort of thing and I can't say they
> don't do it li
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:30 PM, wrote:
From: Thomas Reim
>>
>> Guys I really still hate this :-)
>>
>> Other OSes must de
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:24:39 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Two things I've noticed:
> - Why not dev->mode_config.mutex?
You're right, of course. I noticed that just after posting that version
and updated it; the updated version is on my drm-intel-fixes branch
already (having been reviewed by Jes
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:44:32 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> queue_delayed_work? Plays nicer with other workqueue-items.
Yeah, I'll change this.
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpifulG3hqfz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-de
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:36:31 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> This describes the function better, allowing it to be used where the
> DPCD value is relevant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
> ---
Ah I see you've addressed my previous comment already. :)
You can add my
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes t
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:36:32 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> Eliminates an open-coded read and also gains the retry behaviour of
> intel_dp_get_dpcd, which seems like a good idea.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |8 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insert
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:36:30 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> This uses the common dpcd reading routine, i915_dp_detect_common,
> instead of open-coding a call to intel_dp_aux_native_read. Besides
> reducing duplicated code, this also gains the read retries which
> may be necessary when a cable is fi
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:36:34 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> Display port pipe selection on CPT is not done with a bit in the
> output register, rather it is controlled by a couple of bits in the
> separate transcoder register which indicate which display port output
> is connected to the transcoder
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 23:36 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Use dp_detect_common in hotplug helper
> [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Rename i915_dp_detect_common to
> [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: In intel_dp_init, replace read of DPCD with
>
> These three are simple cleanups to centralize all
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:23:13 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:24:39 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Two things I've noticed:
>
> > - Why not dev->mode_config.mutex?
>
> You're right, of course. I noticed that just after posting that version
> and updated it; the updated vers
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39572
Summary: Cogs: GPU hang
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.humblebundle.com/
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Pri
From: Jerome Glisse
Some CP interrupt were left enabled when disabling interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c |2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/e
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:28 PM, wrote:
> From: Jerome Glisse
>
> Some CP interrupt were left enabled when disabling interrupt.
>
Is there a specific issue this fixes? The bits are not interrupt
sources per se but rather are related to the internal state of the
interrupt controller and should
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:28 PM, wrote:
>> From: Jerome Glisse
>>
>> Some CP interrupt were left enabled when disabling interrupt.
>>
>
> Is there a specific issue this fixes? The bits are not interrupt
> sources per se but rather are rela
From: Alex Deucher
Compute cs support was actually added in 2.11.0 rather than
2.10.0, but the patch was written prior. Update comment
to match.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/driv
2011/7/25 Rob Clark :
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>> 2011/7/22 Jesse Barnes :
>>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:30:00 +0900
>>> Joonyoung Shim wrote:
>>>
Hi,
simple questions :)
2011/6/21 Jesse Barnes :
> Planes are a bit like half-CRTCs. ?They
Two things I've noticed:
- Why not dev->mode_config.mutex? I was under the impression that
mode_config.mutex protects most of the modesetting state and
dev->struct_mutex protects things related to the gpu execution cores
(i.e. all things gem), with struct_mutex nested within
mode_config.mutex. It's
queue_delayed_work? Plays nicer with other workqueue-items.
-Daniel
PS: Scrap my other mail, just noticed that the merged patched r-b'ed
by Jesse uses the mode_config mutex.
--
Daniel Vetter
daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch - +41 (0) 79 364 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
Hi Linus,
Main drm pull request for -rc1, main highlights,
Nouveau: open source fermi ucode, per-client gpu address spaces for nv50
and up.
Intel: FBC cleanups (on by default now), high color support, ring
frequency scaling, shared LLC support, and hangcheck module disabling.
radeon: initial c
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35697
Nikos Chantziaras changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> From 59b920597999381fab70c485c161dd50590e561a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Keith Packard
> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:37:51 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] Revert and fix "drm/i915/dp: remove DPMS mode tracking from
> ?DP"
>
> This reverts commi
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:34 AM, wrote:
> From: Thomas Reim
>
> ? ECS A740GM-M with ATI RADEON 2100 sends data to i2c bus
> ? for a DVI connector that is not implemented/existent on the board.
>
> ? Fix by applying extented DDC probing for this connector.
>
> ? Requires [PATCH] drm/radeon: Fix A
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:30 PM, ? wrote:
>> From: Thomas Reim
Guys I really still hate this :-)
Other OSes must deal with this sort of thing and I can't say they
don't do it like this but I can't say for certain this feels like the
right ans
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:30 PM, ? wrote:
>>> From: Thomas Reim
>
> Guys I really still hate this :-)
>
> Other OSes must deal with this sort of thing and I can't say they
> don't do it li
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Alex Deucher
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:30 PM, ? wrote:
From: Thomas Reim
>>
>> Guys I really still hate this :-)
>>
>> Other OSes mus
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20110726/1b607231/attachment-0001.pgp>
tion/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20110726/8c274b70/attachment.pgp>
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:36:31 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> This describes the function better, allowing it to be used where the
> DPCD value is relevant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
> ---
Ah I see you've addressed my previous comment already. :)
You can add my
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes t
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:36:32 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> Eliminates an open-coded read and also gains the retry behaviour of
> intel_dp_get_dpcd, which seems like a good idea.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |8 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insert
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:36:30 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> This uses the common dpcd reading routine, i915_dp_detect_common,
> instead of open-coding a call to intel_dp_aux_native_read. Besides
> reducing duplicated code, this also gains the read retries which
> may be necessary when a cable is fi
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:36:34 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> Display port pipe selection on CPT is not done with a bit in the
> output register, rather it is controlled by a couple of bits in the
> separate transcoder register which indicate which display port output
> is connected to the transcoder
application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20110726/2993b7d6/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:23:13 -0700
Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:24:39 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Two things I've noticed:
>
> > - Why not dev->mode_config.mutex?
>
> You're right, of course. I noticed that just after posting that version
> and updated it; the updated vers
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39572
Summary: Cogs: GPU hang
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.humblebundle.com/
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Pri
From: Jerome Glisse
Some CP interrupt were left enabled when disabling interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c |2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/e
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:28 PM, wrote:
> From: Jerome Glisse
>
> Some CP interrupt were left enabled when disabling interrupt.
>
Is there a specific issue this fixes? The bits are not interrupt
sources per se but rather are related to the internal state of the
interrupt controller and should
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:28 PM, ? wrote:
>> From: Jerome Glisse
>>
>> Some CP interrupt were left enabled when disabling interrupt.
>>
>
> Is there a specific issue this fixes? ?The bits are not interrupt
> sources per se but rather are rela
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:23:36AM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> Keith,
>
> first of all thanks for your prompt reply. Then...
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:00:41AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:08:06 +0400, Kirill Smelkov
> > wrote:
> >
> > > And now after v3.0 is o
The Dell OptiPlex FX170 claims to have LVDS, but doesn't.
Signed-off-by: Pieterjan Camerlynck
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
index b28f7bd
47 matches
Mail list logo
