https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36563
--- Comment #3 from Michel Dänzer 2011-05-23 00:31:17 PDT
---
Looks like it's hanging when trying to acquire the radeon->bo_handles_mutex .
Does running
thread apply all bt full
in gdb give backtraces for any other threads?
--
Configure bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36563
--- Comment #4 from Ernst Sjöstrand 2011-05-23 01:18:46 PDT
---
Yes, it's probably when a new window is created or similar. But just opening
100 gnome-terminals doesn't trigger it so it's not super easy to trigger.
--
Configure bugmail: https:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
Summary: texture corruption in r600/r600g when using DRI2, no
texture corruption in r600 with dri1
Product: Mesa
Version: 7.10
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #1 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
02:00:48 PDT ---
it seems that attachment sizes are limited.
see http://nenolod.net/~nenolod/radeon-dri2-gltexture-corruption.png for an
example of what i am seeing.
i think this is due to incompl
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #2 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
02:36:47 PDT ---
oh, i forgot to mention, this is on a dual radeon hd 4870 setup.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail bec
On Monday, May 23, 2011 13:55:21 Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 8:54 AM Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 00:44:26 Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Laurent Pinchart
> > > wrote:
> > > > I need to implement support
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher 2011-05-23 05:49:22 PDT ---
Please attach your xorg log, dmesg output, and glxinfo output.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
Hello,
On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 8:54 AM Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 00:44:26 Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Laurent Pinchart
> > wrote:
> > > I need to implement support for a YUV frame buffer in an fbdev driver.
> As the
> > > fbdev API doesn
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37471
--- Comment #1 from Brian Paul 2011-05-23 07:49:02 PDT
---
I think it would be hard to keep that info up to date.
If you're wondering who's most recently been working on a particular driver,
the best thing to do is check the git history.
--
Co
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37253
Sven Arvidsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@whiz.se
--- Comment #1 from Sven A
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #4 from Fredrik Höglund 2011-05-23 10:22:09 PDT
---
Judging by the screenshot this may be a duplicate of bug 33824.
The logout effect in KWin uses automatically generated mipmaps + LOD bias to
blur all windows except the dialog in t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37513
Summary: WebGL in Chrome: BadDrawable
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: D
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Jakobi 2011-05-23 10:31:38 PDT
---
This is most likely _no_ duplicate, since tiling still has to be force on with
an envvar. And I don't see this happening from the explanations in the initial
post.
--
Configure bugm
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_crtc.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_crtc.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_crtc.c
index 48f5ff0..ec84878 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_crt
Noticed by Droste on IRC.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/nid.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/nid.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/nid.h
index b2088c1..9736746 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/nid.h
+++ b/driv
So I've been busily merging stuff, and just wanted to send out a quick
reminder that I warned people in the 39 announcement that this might
be a slightly shorter merge window than usual, so that I can avoid
having to make the -rc1 release from Japan using my slow laptop (doing
"allyesconfig" builds
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:13:29PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> PS. The voices in my head also tell me that the numbers are getting
> too big. I may just call the thing 2.8.0. And I almost guarantee that
> this PS is going to result in more discussion than the rest, but when
> the voices tell me
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #6 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
12:45:35 PDT ---
re: color tiling, i believe it is disabled by default, but i will try and see
if that is the problem.
i will also get dmesg / Xorg logs when i switch back over to DRI2.
--
Config
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35434
--- Comment #10 from Benjamin Bellec 2011-05-23 13:12:37
PDT ---
In fact, I have these 2 issues also with gallium-swrast.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
On Mon, 23 May 2011 21:25:25 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > PS. The voices in my head also tell me that the numbers are getting
> > too big. I may just call the thing 2.8.0. And I almost guarantee that
> > this PS is going to result in more dis
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
> cutting 3.0.0! :-)
So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0",
not "3.0.0" - the stable team would get the third digit rather than
the four
Hi Florian,
On Saturday 21 May 2011 00:33:02 Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 10:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I need to implement support for a YUV frame buffer in an fbdev driver. As
> > the fbdev API doesn't support this out of the box, I've spent a c
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> PS. The voices in my head also tell me that the numbers are getting too big.
> I may just call the thing 2.8.0. And I almost guarantee that this PS is going
> to result in more discussion than the rest, but when the voices tell me to do
> things, I listen.
I really
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
Maté changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mate.ta...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from Maté
since kernel .39 i can not boot, when kernel go to gmbus start the issue.
I try capture a dump with kexec, but no success, so i have the idea to
make video booting,
kernel version 2.6.39-02745-g0b26d47 and 2.6.39 vanilla same problem.
http://www.vimeo.com/24138372
lspci -v
00:02.0 VGA compatible
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:33:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
> > cutting 3.0.0! :-)
>
> So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0",
Hi Laurent,
On 05/23/2011 09:00 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Saturday 21 May 2011 00:33:02 Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote:
On 05/17/2011 10:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
- Other solutions are possible, such as adding new ioctls. Those
solutions are more intrusive, and require larger change
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
>> cutting 3.0.0! :-)
>
> So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0",
> not "3.0.0
On Mon, 23 May 2011 19:17:21 -0400 Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:33:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
> > > cutting 3.0.0! :-)
> >
> > So
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37253
--- Comment #2 from Benoit Jacob 2011-05-23 16:22:12 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is the same as bug 33188 isn't it?
Looks like it (didn't know about the other bug), but this bug has more specific
info, and also the testcase link is
Another advantage of switching numbering models (ie 3.0 instead of
2.8.x) would be that it would also make the "odd numbers are also
numbers" transition much more natural.
Because of our historical even/odd model, I wouldn't do a 2.7.x -
there's just too much history of 2.1, 2.3, 2.5 being develop
On 05/23/2011 04:17 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:33:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
>>> cutting 3.0.0! :-)
>>
>> So I'm toying with 3.0 (
Hi Linus,
On 05/23/2011 04:33 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
>> cutting 3.0.0! :-)
>
> So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0",
> not "3.0
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Another advantage of switching numbering models (ie 3.0 instead of
> 2.8.x) would be that it would also make the "odd numbers are also
> numbers" transition much more natural.
Yeah, it sounds really good to get rid of the (meanwhile) meaningless
"2.6." prefix from our
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
> > cutting 3.0.0! :-)
>
> So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0",
> not "3.0.0" - the stable team would
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #7 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
21:29:45 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=47086)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=47086)
dmesg
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #8 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
21:31:43 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=47087)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=47087)
glxinfo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
William Pitcock changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47086|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #10 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
21:41:53 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=47089)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=47089)
Xorg.0.log
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #11 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
21:44:01 PDT ---
glxinfo, dmesg and xorg log have been attached.
KMS color tiling is disabled. color tiling is also disabled without KMS.
enabling color tiling on DRI1 does not trigger the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36563
--- Comment #3 from Michel D?nzer 2011-05-23 00:31:17
PDT ---
Looks like it's hanging when trying to acquire the radeon->bo_handles_mutex .
Does running
thread apply all bt full
in gdb give backtraces for any other threads?
--
Configure bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36563
--- Comment #4 from Ernst Sj?strand 2011-05-23 01:18:46
PDT ---
Yes, it's probably when a new window is created or similar. But just opening
100 gnome-terminals doesn't trigger it so it's not super easy to trigger.
--
Configure bugmail: https:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
Summary: texture corruption in r600/r600g when using DRI2, no
texture corruption in r600 with dri1
Product: Mesa
Version: 7.10
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #1 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
02:00:48 PDT ---
it seems that attachment sizes are limited.
see http://nenolod.net/~nenolod/radeon-dri2-gltexture-corruption.png for an
example of what i am seeing.
i think this is due to incompl
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #2 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
02:36:47 PDT ---
oh, i forgot to mention, this is on a dual radeon hd 4870 setup.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail bec
On Monday, May 23, 2011 13:55:21 Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 8:54 AM Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 00:44:26 Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Laurent Pinchart
> > > wrote:
> > > > I need to implement support
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher 2011-05-23 05:49:22 PDT
---
Please attach your xorg log, dmesg output, and glxinfo output.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
Hello,
On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 8:54 AM Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 00:44:26 Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Laurent Pinchart
> > wrote:
> > > I need to implement support for a YUV frame buffer in an fbdev driver.
> As the
> > > fbdev API doesn
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37471
--- Comment #1 from Brian Paul 2011-05-23 07:49:02
PDT ---
I think it would be hard to keep that info up to date.
If you're wondering who's most recently been working on a particular driver,
the best thing to do is check the git history.
--
Co
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37253
Sven Arvidsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sa at whiz.se
--- Comment #1 from Sven
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #4 from Fredrik H?glund 2011-05-23 10:22:09
PDT ---
Judging by the screenshot this may be a duplicate of bug 33824.
The logout effect in KWin uses automatically generated mipmaps + LOD bias to
blur all windows except the dialog in t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37513
Summary: WebGL in Chrome: BadDrawable
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: D
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Jakobi 2011-05-23 10:31:38
PDT ---
This is most likely _no_ duplicate, since tiling still has to be force on with
an envvar. And I don't see this happening from the explanations in the initial
post.
--
Configure bugm
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_crtc.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_crtc.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_crtc.c
index 48f5ff0..ec84878 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_crt
Noticed by Droste on IRC.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/nid.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/nid.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/nid.h
index b2088c1..9736746 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/nid.h
+++ b/driv
So I've been busily merging stuff, and just wanted to send out a quick
reminder that I warned people in the 39 announcement that this might
be a slightly shorter merge window than usual, so that I can avoid
having to make the -rc1 release from Japan using my slow laptop (doing
"allyesconfig" builds
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:13:29PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> PS. The voices in my head also tell me that the numbers are getting
> too big. I may just call the thing 2.8.0. And I almost guarantee that
> this PS is going to result in more discussion than the rest, but when
> the voices tell me
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #6 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
12:45:35 PDT ---
re: color tiling, i believe it is disabled by default, but i will try and see
if that is the problem.
i will also get dmesg / Xorg logs when i switch back over to DRI2.
--
Config
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35434
--- Comment #10 from Benjamin Bellec 2011-05-23
13:12:37 PDT ---
In fact, I have these 2 issues also with gallium-swrast.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
On Mon, 23 May 2011 21:25:25 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > PS. The voices in my head also tell me that the numbers are getting
> > too big. I may just call the thing 2.8.0. And I almost guarantee that
> > this PS is going to result in more dis
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
> cutting 3.0.0! :-)
So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0",
not "3.0.0" - the stable team would get the third digit rather than
the four
Hi Florian,
On Saturday 21 May 2011 00:33:02 Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 10:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I need to implement support for a YUV frame buffer in an fbdev driver. As
> > the fbdev API doesn't support this out of the box, I've spent a c
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> PS. The voices in my head also tell me that the numbers are getting too big.
> I may just call the thing 2.8.0. And I almost guarantee that this PS is going
> to result in more discussion than the rest, but when the voices tell me to do
> things, I listen.
I really
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18872
Mat? changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mate.taixi at gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from M
since kernel .39 i can not boot, when kernel go to gmbus start the issue.
I try capture a dump with kexec, but no success, so i have the idea to
make video booting,
kernel version 2.6.39-02745-g0b26d47 and 2.6.39 vanilla same problem.
http://www.vimeo.com/24138372
lspci -v
00:02.0 VGA compatible
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:33:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
> > cutting 3.0.0! :-)
>
> So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0",
Hi Laurent,
On 05/23/2011 09:00 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Saturday 21 May 2011 00:33:02 Florian Tobias Schandinat wrote:
>> On 05/17/2011 10:07 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> - Other solutions are possible, such as adding new ioctls. Those
>>> solutions are more intrusive, and require larg
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
>> cutting 3.0.0! :-)
>
> So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0",
> not "3.0.0
On Mon, 23 May 2011 19:17:21 -0400 Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:33:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
> > > cutting 3.0.0! :-)
> >
> > So
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37253
--- Comment #2 from Benoit Jacob 2011-05-23 16:22:12
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is the same as bug 33188 isn't it?
Looks like it (didn't know about the other bug), but this bug has more specific
info, and also the testcase link is
Another advantage of switching numbering models (ie 3.0 instead of
2.8.x) would be that it would also make the "odd numbers are also
numbers" transition much more natural.
Because of our historical even/odd model, I wouldn't do a 2.7.x -
there's just too much history of 2.1, 2.3, 2.5 being develop
On 05/23/2011 04:17 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:33:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
>>> cutting 3.0.0! :-)
>>
>> So I'm toying with 3.0 (
Hi Linus,
On 05/23/2011 04:33 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
>> cutting 3.0.0! :-)
>
> So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0",
> not "3.0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #7 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
21:29:45 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=47086)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=47086)
dmesg
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #8 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
21:31:43 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=47087)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=47087)
glxinfo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
William Pitcock changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47086|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #10 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
21:41:53 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=47089)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=47089)
Xorg.0.log
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37490
--- Comment #11 from William Pitcock 2011-05-23
21:44:01 PDT ---
glxinfo, dmesg and xorg log have been attached.
KMS color tiling is disabled. color tiling is also disabled without KMS.
enabling color tiling on DRI1 does not trigger the bug.
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> PS. The voices in my head also tell me that the numbers are getting
> too big. I may just call the thing 2.8.0. And I almost guarantee that
> this PS is going to result in more discussion than the rest, but when
> the voices tell me to do things, I liste
On 5/23/11, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
>> cutting 3.0.0! :-)
I think, the best time for this, after reorganize the ARM arch folder / tree.
>
> So I'm toying with 3.
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:33:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
> > cutting 3.0.0! :-)
>
> So I'm toying with 3.0 (and in that case, it really would be "3.0",
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:21:26PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> They tell him to avoid the question to which 42 is the answer.
What 2.6 Linux kernel version was the last before 3.0?
-- Steve
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 03:21:21PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:33:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > I really hope there's also a voice that tells you to wait until .42 before
> > > cutting 3.0.0! :-)
> >
> > So
83 matches
Mail list logo