[PATCH] drm: Always show the probed connector status

2010-12-30 Thread Chris Wilson
Otherwise if the connector is left in an unknown status, we leave the function without any trace leaving me quite confused as to where the output went. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c | 28 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 dele

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:49:33 +0800 (SGT) Jeff Chua wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > > > Randy, Jeff and Alex, does the below help at all? If so, it may be the > > minimal fix we want for 2.6.37. > > Jesse, > > Yes, that worked for me. I improved on the pa

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap > wrote: > > > > The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log > > is this: > > Hmm. I suspect that difference should have gone away with commit > 92971021c6328

Re: Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:49:33 +0800 (SGT), Jeff Chua wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > > > Randy, Jeff and Alex, does the below help at all? If so, it may be the > > minimal fix we want for 2.6.37. > > Jesse, > > Yes, that worked for me. I improved on the p

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Alex Riesen
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:53, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> > Doesn't change anything here. Display stays blank. >> >> Sounds like your problem is separate from SSC then, more likely related >> to panel power or backlight control. ?Have you tried bisecting for the >> problem between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36? >

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Alex Riesen
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:13, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> After closing and opening the lid (displays backlight is back) >> >> ? http://vin-soft.org/~raa/public/test/intel_gpu_dump-after-lid > > I need the intel_reg_dumper output, not intel_gpu_dump. :) > Hmm, there is no intel_reg_dumper in intel-gp

2.6.37-rc8: Reported regressions 2.6.35 -> 2.6.36

2010-12-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
[NOTE: This most likely is the last summary report of regressions introduced between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36.] This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before 2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team. If any of them have been fixed a

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Alex Riesen
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:20, Alex Riesen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 00:13, Jesse Barnes > wrote: >>> After closing and opening the lid (displays backlight is back) >>> >>> ? http://vin-soft.org/~raa/public/test/intel_gpu_dump-after-lid >> >> I need the intel_reg_dumper output, not intel_

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Alex Riesen
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 01:02, Jesse Barnes wrote: > That's the easiest way; I think there are existing packages available > as well, but you may have to check Karmic or newer. Never mind. I'm lazy (that's not to say someone is too). I redid the test: Before running "xset dpms force standby":

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Jeff Chua
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Randy, Jeff and Alex, does the below help at all? If so, it may be the > minimal fix we want for 2.6.37. Jesse, Yes, that worked for me. I improved on the patch a bit below. Thanks, Jeff --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c 2010-12

[PATCH] drm: Always show the probed connector status

2010-12-30 Thread Chris Wilson
Otherwise if the connector is left in an unknown status, we leave the function without any trace leaving me quite confused as to where the output went. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c | 28 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 dele

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:49:33 +0800 (SGT) Jeff Chua wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > > > Randy, Jeff and Alex, does the below help at all? If so, it may be the > > minimal fix we want for 2.6.37. > > Jesse, > > Yes, that worked for me. I improved on the pa

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:40:04 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Randy Dunlap > wrote: > > > > The only significant difference that I can see in the kernel message log > > is this: > > Hmm. I suspect that difference should have gone away with commit > 92971021c6328

Linux 2.6.37-rc8 (no fb)

2010-12-30 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:49:33 +0800 (SGT), Jeff Chua wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > > > Randy, Jeff and Alex, does the below help at all? If so, it may be the > > minimal fix we want for 2.6.37. > > Jesse, > > Yes, that worked for me. I improved on the pa