RE: virtio_gpu_cmd_resource_flush

2024-07-08 Thread Kasireddy, Vivek
Hi Josh, > > > If virgl=true (which means blob=false at the moment), then things work > > very differently. > Yes, we're using virglrenderer. The flushed resources are backed by host Virgl is not my forte. Someone working on virgl should be able to help you. Thanks, Vivek > allocated buffers.

Re: virtio_gpu_cmd_resource_flush

2024-07-06 Thread Josh Simonot
> If virgl=true (which means blob=false at the moment), then things work > very differently. Yes, we're using virglrenderer. The flushed resources are backed by host allocated buffers. We tried posting the flushed resource directly to the display and replied to the flush immediately (since not f

RE: virtio_gpu_cmd_resource_flush

2024-07-06 Thread Kasireddy, Vivek
Hi Josh, > It looks like the virtio-gpu flush should be fenced, but on the host side the > received flush cmd doesn't have the fence flag set, and no fence_id.  So, > I have to reply right away instead of waiting for scanout to complete. > Is that expected?  then what's the right way to vsync the

virtio_gpu_cmd_resource_flush

2024-07-03 Thread Josh Simonot
It looks like the virtio-gpu flush should be fenced, but on the host side the received flush cmd doesn't have the fence flag set, and no fence_id. So, I have to reply right away instead of waiting for scanout to complete. Is that expected? then what's the right way to vsync the guest? At the