On 16 June 2015 at 17:12, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Di, 2015-06-16 at 14:55 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> Hey Gerd,
>>
>> This probably doesn't matter yet, but they virtgpu_vq buffer
>> allocation code you added isn't threadsafe.
>
> Right, I'll add a lock (or do you have a patch already?)
I've go
Hey Gerd,
This probably doesn't matter yet, but they virtgpu_vq buffer
allocation code you added isn't threadsafe.
I'm not sure what was wrong with the original code I wrote, you never
contacted me with reasons for rewriting it, but the Linux kmalloc
isn't that slow, but if we want some form of c
On Di, 2015-06-16 at 14:55 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Hey Gerd,
>
> This probably doesn't matter yet, but they virtgpu_vq buffer
> allocation code you added isn't threadsafe.
Right, I'll add a lock (or do you have a patch already?)
> I'm not sure what was wrong with the original code I wrote, y
